...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical nursing >A critical review of published research literature reviews on nursing and healthcare ageism
【24h】

A critical review of published research literature reviews on nursing and healthcare ageism

机译:关于护理和医疗年龄的发布研究文献综述的关键综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Aims and objectives To establish how common and impactful nursing and healthcare ageism is and whether proven interventions or prevention methods exist. Background Ageism has been a concern since 1969 when it was first introduced as a concept for social reform. As ageism has been linked to lower quality health services and reduced health care access, it is imperative that healthcare and nursing ageism is prevented or identified and reduced or eliminated. Design A qualitative narrative review of published research literature reviews using a scoping design to map all published reviews was undertaken. The EBSCO Discovery Service (providing access to articles in 271 databases, including MEDLINE and CINAHL ) and Directory of Open Access Journals (providing access to over 9,000 open access journals) were used to find review articles. Using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and limited by English language and peer‐review publications, 12 eligible reviews were identified and information from them was systematically identified, assessed and synthesised. Results The 12 reviews did not provide clear and convincing information to determine how common and impactful nursing or healthcare ageism is, nor what can best be done to prevent or address it. Although each review had value since research literature was collected and discussed on nursing or healthcare ageism, the array of literature search and analysis methods, and diversity in conclusions reached about the evidence is highly problematic. Conclusion Research literature reviews offering a more balanced perspective and demonstrating greater care in finding and using quality evidence are needed. Relevance to clinical practice At this point in time, there is no clear understanding of how widespread and impactful nursing or healthcare ageism is, and what can best be done to prevent or address it. Nurses need to be aware that ageism may be common and impactful, and guard against it.
机译:旨在建立常见和有影响力和医疗年龄的宗旨和目标以及是否存在证明干预或预防方法。后台年龄阶段自1969年以来一直是一个关注的问题,当时它是第一次被引入社会改革的概念。随着年龄宣传与较低质量的卫生服务和减少医疗保健获取有关,必须防止或确定和减少或删除医疗保健和哺乳期症。设计了对公布研究文献综述的定性叙述审查,使用范围设计来映射所有已发布的评论。 EBSCO Discovery Service(提供对271个数据库中的文章,包括Medline和Cinahl)和开放访问期刊目录(提供超过9,000多个开放式访问期间)寻找审查文章。使用预定的包含和排除标准,并限制英语语言和同行评审出版物,12项符合条件的评论得到了解,并系统地确定,评估和综合。结果12条评判不提供明确和令人信服的信息,以确定常见和有影响力的护理或医疗年龄是多么能够努力预防或解决它。虽然每次审查都有价值,因为在研究文献被收集并讨论了护理或医疗保健年龄,所以关于证据的结论中的文献搜索和分析方法和多样性是非常有问题的。结论研究文献综述提供更平衡的观点,并在寻找和使用质量证据时展示更高的护理。与临床实践的相关性在此时的情况下,对普遍和有影响程度的护理或医疗年龄的普遍性和医疗年龄的临床实践有明确的了解,并且可以最好地完成以防止或解决它。护士需要意识到年龄宣离可能是常见而有影响的,并防止它。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号