首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical nursing >An integrated review of the correlation between critical thinking ability and clinical decision‐making in nursing
【24h】

An integrated review of the correlation between critical thinking ability and clinical decision‐making in nursing

机译:核心思维能力与护理临床决策相关性的综合综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aims and objectives To explore whether there is a correlation between critical thinking ability and clinical decision‐making among nurses. Background Critical thinking is currently considered as an essential component of nurses’ professional judgement and clinical decision‐making. If confirmed, nursing curricula may be revised emphasising on critical thinking with the expectation to improve clinical decision‐making and thus better health care. Design Integrated literature review. Methods The integrative review was carried out after a comprehensive literature search using electronic databases Ovid, EBESCO MEDLINE , EBESCO CINAHL , PROQ uest and Internet search engine Google Scholar. Two hundred and 22 articles from January 1980 to end of 2015 were retrieved. All studies evaluating the relationship between critical thinking and clinical decision‐making, published in English language with nurses or nursing students as the study population, were included. No qualitative studies were found investigating the relationship between critical thinking and clinical decision‐making, while 10 quantitative studies met the inclusion criteria and were further evaluated using the Quality Assessment and Validity Tool. As a result, one study was excluded due to a low‐quality score, with the remaining nine accepted for this review. Results Four of nine studies established a positive relationship between critical thinking and clinical decision‐making. Another five studies did not demonstrate a significant correlation. The lack of refinement in studies’ design and instrumentation were arguably the main reasons for the inconsistent results. Conclusions Research studies yielded contradictory results as regard to the relationship between critical thinking and clinical decision‐making; therefore, the evidence is not convincing. Future quantitative studies should have representative sample size, use critical thinking measurement tools related to the healthcare sector and evaluate the predisposition of test takers towards their willingness and ability to think. There is also a need for qualitative studies to provide a fresh approach in exploring the relationship between these variables uncovering currently unknown contributing factors. Relevance to clinical practice This review confirmed that evidence to support the existence of relationships between critical thinking and clinical decision‐making is still unsubstantiated. Therefore, it serves as a call for nurse leaders and nursing academics to produce quality studies in order to firmly support or reject the hypothesis that there is a statistically significant correlation between critical thinking and clinical decision‐making.
机译:旨在探索护士之间批判性思维能力和临床决策之间是否存在相关性。背景技术目前被认为是护士专业判断和临床决策的重要组成部分。如果确认,可以修改护理课程,并对预期提高临床决策并更好地保健,强调批判性思考。设计集成文献综述。方法使用电子数据库Ovid,Ebesco Medline,Ebesco Cinahl,Proq Uest和Internet搜索引擎Google Scholar,在全面的文献搜索后进行综合审查。从1980年1月到2015年底的二百和22篇文章被检索到2015年底。包括评估批判性思维与临床决策关系的研究,用护士或护理学生作为学习人群,刊登了临床决策关系。没有发现在批判性思维和临床决策之间的关系,而10个定量研究达到了纳入标准,并使用质量评估和有效性工具进行了进一步评估。因此,由于低质量分数,一项研究被排除在外,剩下的九个接受了这篇综述。结果九项研究中有四项建立了批判性思维与临床决策的积极关系。另外五项研究没有表现出显着的相关性。缺乏研究的设计和仪器的细化可以说是不一致结果的主要原因。结论研究研究涉及批判性思维与临床决策之间的关系矛盾的结果;因此,证据不令人信服。未来的定量研究应该具有代表性的样本大小,使用与医疗保健部门相关的关键思维测量工具,并评估考试者对他们愿意和思考的能力的易感性。还需要定性研究,以提供一种探索目前未知贡献因素的这些变量之间的关系的新方法。与临床实践的相关性本综述证实证据支持批判性思维和临床决策之间存在关系的证据仍未取消证实。因此,它是呼吁护士领导者和护理学者,以生产质量研究,以便牢固地支持或拒绝具有统计上思维与临床决策之间存在统计上显着相关性的假设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号