首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical nursing >A cross‐validation study of the incident‐reporting attitude scale for staff in long‐term care facilities—A cross‐sectional study
【24h】

A cross‐validation study of the incident‐reporting attitude scale for staff in long‐term care facilities—A cross‐sectional study

机译:对长期护理设施员工事件报告态度规模的交叉验证研究 - 横断面研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Abstract Aims and objectives To test the construct and concurrent validity and reliability of the incident‐reporting attitude scale used for staff in long‐term care facilities (IRA‐LTC) by the two‐phase cross‐validation method. Background Lack of accurate measurement on incident‐reporting attitude might hinder improvements of safety practice in long‐term care facilities. Design/Methods A two‐phase cross‐sectional questionnaire survey was conducted in Taiwan. A fixed proportion of long‐term care facilities were randomly selected that included 20 and 15 long‐term care facilities at phases one and two separately. Nursing and administrative staffs in these facilities were recruited at the first phase ( N ?=?207) for testing the validity and reliability of the newly developed scale and for cross‐validation of the scale at the second phase ( N ?=?251). The scale of IRA‐LTC was a self‐developed structured questionnaire consisting of 31 items. The data were analysed using spss for Windows 20.0 and AMOS 24.0. Descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, Cronbach's α , exploratory and confirmatory factory analysis were carried to examine the homogeneity of items, reliability, construct and concurrent validity. The STROBE checklist was adhered (See Appendix S1). Results The IRA‐LTC scale comprised two dimensions: “cognition and intention to report” and “barriers to report.” The two‐factor structure explained 60.20%–61.89% of the total variance at two phases. Validation of the initial factorial model gained at the first phase was satisfactorily supported at the second phase. Concurrent validity of the IRA‐LTC scale was satisfied. Cronbach's α for the scale and subscales was 0.94–0.97. Conclusions This IRA‐LTC scale is valid and reliable and can be recommended to evaluate the incident‐reporting attitude among all kinds of staff in long‐term care facilities. Relevance to clinical practice Positive incident‐reporting attitude can lead to positive incident‐reporting behaviour. Using the IRA‐LTC scale for assessing staff's incident‐reporting attitude is recommended as the first step to enhance staff's safety performance in long‐term care facilities.
机译:摘要目的与目标,以两相交叉验证方法测试用于长期护理设施(IRA-LTC)的工作人员的事件报告态度规模的构建和并发有效性和可靠性。背景技术缺乏对事件报告态度的准确测量可能会妨碍长期护理设施的安全实践的改进。设计/方法在台湾进行了两相横断面问卷调查。随机选择固定的长期护理设施比例,其中包括一个和两个分别的阶段20和15个长期护理设施。这些设施中的护理和行政人员在第一阶段(N?=?207)招募了新开发规模的有效性和可靠性以及在第二阶段的尺度的交叉验证(n?= 251) 。 IRA-LTC的规模是由31项组成的自我开发的结构化问卷。使用SPSS for Windows 20.0和AMOS 24.0进行分析数据。描述性统计,相关分析,Cronbach的α,探索性和确认的工厂分析,以检查项目的均匀性,可靠性,构建和效用。遵守频闪核对清单(见附录S1)。结果IRA-LTC规模包括两个维度:“认知和报告”和“报告障碍”。双因素结构在两个阶段的总差异中解释了60.20%-61.89%。在第二阶段令人满意地支持在第一阶段获得的初始因子模型的验证。满足IRA-LTC规模的并发有效性。 Cronbach的α对于秤和分量表为0.94-0.97。结论这一稳定规模有效可靠,可以建议评估长期护理设施中各种员工的事件报告态度。与临床实践的相关性积极事件报告态度可能导致积极的事故报告行为。建议使用IRA-LTC规模评估员工的事件报告态度,作为提高人员在长期护理设施中的安全性能的第一步。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号