...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of community health >Use of Evidence-Based Interventions and Implementation Strategies to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in Federally Qualified Health Centers
【24h】

Use of Evidence-Based Interventions and Implementation Strategies to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in Federally Qualified Health Centers

机译:使用基于证据的干预和实施策略来增加联邦合格的卫生中心的结肠直肠癌筛查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

While colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates have been increasing in the general population, rates are considerably lower in Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), which serve a large proportion of uninsured and medically vulnerable patients. Efforts to screen eligible patients must be accelerated if we are to reach the national screening goal of 80% by 2018 and beyond. To inform this work, we conducted a survey of key informants at FQHCs in eight states to determine which evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to promote CRC screening are currently being used, and which implementation strategies are being employed to ensure that the interventions are executed as intended. One hundred and forty-eight FQHCs were invited to participate in the study, and 56 completed surveys were received for a response rate of 38%. Results demonstrated that provider reminder and recall systems were the most commonly used EBIs (44.6%) while the most commonly used implementation strategy was the identification of barriers (84.0%). The mean number of EBIs that were fully implemented at the centers was 2.4 (range 0-7) out of seven. Almost one-quarter of respondents indicated that their FQHCs were not using any EBIs to increase CRC screening. Full implementation of EBIs was correlated with higher CRC screening rates. These findings identify gaps as well as the preferences and needs of FQHCs in selecting and implementing EBIs for CRC screening.
机译:虽然整数癌(CRC)筛选率在一般人群中越来越大,联邦合格的医疗中心(FQCS)的率相当较低,其占大部分无保险和医学脆弱的患者。如果我们将在2018年及以后达到80%以上的国家筛查目标,则必须加快筛选符合条件的患者的努力。要告知这项工作,我们对八个国家的FQCS进行了关键信息人进行了调查,以确定目前正在使用哪些基于证据的干预措施(EBIS),并正在采用哪些实施策略来确保执行干预措施如预期。邀请一百四十八四的FQCS参加该研究,并收到56份完成的调查,响应率为38%。结果表明,提供商提醒和召回系统是最常用的EBIS(44.6%),而最常用的实施策略是识别障碍(84.0%)。七分之一的中心完全实施的ebis的平均数为2.4(范围0-7)。几乎四分之一的受访者表示,他们的FQCS没有使用任何EBIS增加CRC筛查。全面实施EBIS与较高的CRC筛选率相关。这些调查结果识别差距以及为CRC筛选选择和实施EBIS时的FQCS的偏好和需求。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of community health》 |2018年第6期|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Univ South Carolina Arnold Sch Publ Hlth Dept Epidemiol &

    Biostat Columbia SC USA;

    Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill UNC Ctr Hlth Promot &

    Dis Prevent CB 7424 Carrboro NC 27510 USA;

    Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill Sch Nursing CB 7460 Chapel Hill NC 27599 USA;

    Univ South Carolina Arnold Sch Publ Hlth Dept Hlth Promot Educ &

    Behav Columbia SC 29208 USA;

    Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill UNC Ctr Hlth Promot &

    Dis Prevent CB 7426 Chapel Hill NC 27599;

    Univ Kentucky Coll Publ Hlth Dept Hlth Behav &

    Soc 2365 Harrodsburg Rd Ste A230 Lexington KY;

    Univ Iowa Coll Publ Hlth Dept Community &

    Behav Hlth 145 N Riverside Dr 100 CPHB Iowa City IA;

    Univ S Florida Coll Publ Hlth Dept Community &

    Family Hlth 13201 Bruce B Downs Blvd MDC 56;

    Case Western Reserve Univ Prevent Res Ctr Hlth Neighborhoods Family Med &

    Epidemiol &

    Biostat;

    Univ Penn Dept Biostat &

    Epidemiol Sch Med 801 Blockley Hall 423 Guardian Dr Philadelphia PA;

    Univ Washington Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr Dept Hlth Serv 1100 Fairview Ave N M3-B232 Seattle;

    Emory Univ Emory Prevent Res Ctr Rollins Sch Publ Hlth Dept Behav Sci &

    Hlth Educ 1518 Clifton;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 地下建筑;
  • 关键词

    Community health center; Colorectal cancer; Screening; Evidence-based interventions;

    机译:社区保健中心;结直肠癌;筛选;基于证据的干预措施;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号