首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Use of Evidence-Based Interventions and Implementation Strategies to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in Federally Qualified Health Centers
【2h】

Use of Evidence-Based Interventions and Implementation Strategies to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in Federally Qualified Health Centers

机译:使用循证干预措施和实施策略来增加联邦合格卫生中心的大肠癌筛查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

While colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates have been increasing in the general population, rates are considerably lower in Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), which serve a large proportion of uninsured and medically vulnerable patients. Efforts to screen eligible patients must be accelerated if we are to reach the national screening goal of 80% by 2018 and beyond. To inform this work, we conducted a survey of key informants at FQHCs in eight states to determine which evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to promote CRC screening are currently being used, and which implementation strategies are being employed to ensure that the interventions are executed as intended. One hundred and forty-eight FQHCs were invited to participate in the study, and 56 completed surveys were received for a response rate of 38%. Results demonstrated that provider reminder and recall systems were the most commonly used EBIs (44.6%) while the most commonly used implementation strategy was the identification of barriers (84.0%). The mean number of EBIs that were fully implemented at the centers was 2.4 (range 0–7) out of seven. Almost one-quarter of respondents indicated that their FQHCs were not using any EBIs to increase CRC screening. Full implementation of EBIs was correlated with higher CRC screening rates. These findings identify gaps as well as the preferences and needs of FQHCs in selecting and implementing EBIs for CRC screening.
机译:虽然普通人群中大肠癌(CRC)的筛查率一直在上升,但联邦合格健康中心(FQHC)的筛查率却低得多,这些中心为大部分未投保且医疗脆弱的患者提供服务。如果我们要在2018年及以后达到80%的国家筛查目标,就必须加快筛查合格患者的努力。为了为这项工作提供信息,我们对八个州的FQHC的关键信息提供者进行了调查,以确定当前正在使用哪些基于证据的干预措施来促进CRC筛查,并采用哪种实施策略来确保干预措施得以执行如预期。邀请了148个FQHC参加该研究,并完成了56项调查,答复率为38%。结果表明,提供者提醒和召回系统是最常用的EBI(44.6%),而最常用的实施策略是识别障碍(84.0%)。在中心中完全实施的EBI的平均数量为7(2.4)(0-7)。几乎四分之一的受访者表示,他们的FQHC没有使用任何EBI来增加CRC筛查。 EBI的全面实施与更高的CRC筛查率相关。这些发现确定了FQHC在选择和实施用于CRC筛查的EBI方面的差距以及偏好和需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号