...
首页> 外文期刊>Health education & behavior: the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education >Assessing Levels and Correlates of Implementation of Evidence-Based Approaches for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Cross-Sectional Study With Federally Qualified Health Centers
【24h】

Assessing Levels and Correlates of Implementation of Evidence-Based Approaches for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Cross-Sectional Study With Federally Qualified Health Centers

机译:评估循环癌筛查循证方法的水平和相关性:联邦合格卫生中心的横截面研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Multiple evidence-based approaches (EBAs) exist to improve colorectal cancer screening in health clinics. The success of these approaches is tied to effective implementation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the implementation of EBAs for colorectal cancer screening and clinic-level correlates of implementation in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). We conducted descriptive and cross-sectional analyses using data collected from FQHC clinics across seven states (n = 51). A clinic representative completed electronic surveys about clinic characteristics (e.g., size, patient characteristics, and medical record system characteristics) and the implementation of Community Guide recommended EBAs (e.g., client reminders, small media, and provider assessment and feedback). We used bivariate Spearman correlations to assess clinic-level correlates with implementation outcomes. Most clinics were planning to implement, in the early implementation stages, or inconsistently implementing EBAs. No EBA was fully implemented by more than nine (17.6%) clinics. Clinic size variables were inversely related to implementation levels of one-on-one education; medical record variables were directly related to implementation levels of client and provider reminders as well as provider assessment and feedback; and rapid and timely feedback from clinic leaders was directly associated with implementation levels of four out of six EBAs. Given the varying levels of implementation, clinics need to assess current use of implementation strategies and improve effective program delivery to increase colorectal cancer screening among their patients. In addition, clinics should also consider how their characteristics may support or serve as a barrier to implementation in their respective settings.
机译:存在多种基于证据的方法(EBAS)以改善健康诊所的结肠直肠癌筛选。这些方法的成功与有效实施相关联。因此,本研究的目的是评估联邦癌症筛查和临床水平的eBAS的实施,联邦合格的保健中心(FQHCS)的实施。我们使用从七个态(n = 51)中的FQHC诊所收集的数据进行了描述性和横截面分析。诊所代表完成了关于临床特征的电子调查(例如,大小,患者特征和医疗系统特征)以及社区指南的实施推荐EBAS(例如,客户提醒,小媒体和提供商评估和反馈)。我们使用了双方的Spearman相关性,以评估临床水平与实施结果相关。大多数诊所都计划在早期实施阶段进行实施,或者不一致地实施EBAS。没有EBA完全由超过九点(17.6%)的诊所实现。临床尺寸变量与一对一教育的实施水平反向关系;医疗记录变量与客户和提供者提醒的实施级别直接相关,以及提供商评估和反馈;临床领导者的快速和及时的反馈与六个EBAS中的四个二级的实施直接相关。鉴于不同的实施水平,诊所需要评估当前使用实施策略,并改善有效的方案交付,以增加其患者之间的结肠直肠癌筛查。此外,诊所还应考虑他们的特性如何支持或作为其各自设置中实施的障碍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号