...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of comparative effectiveness research >A criterion-based approach to systematic and transparent comparative effectiveness: A case study in psoriatic arthritis
【24h】

A criterion-based approach to systematic and transparent comparative effectiveness: A case study in psoriatic arthritis

机译:基于标准的系统和透明比较效果的方法 - 一种基于银屑病关节炎的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Indirect treatment comparisons are used when no direct comparison is available. Comparison networks should satisfy the transitivity assumption, that is, equal likelihood of treatment assignment for a given patient based on comparability of studies. Materials & methods: Seven criteria were evaluated across 18 randomized controlled trials in psoriatic arthritis: inclusion/exclusion criteria, clinical trial design and follow-up, patient-level baseline characteristics
机译:在没有直接比较时使用间接治疗比较。 比较网络应该满足基于研究的可比性的给定患者的治疗分配的等于的等同性。 材料和方法:在银屑病关节炎的18项随机对照试验中评估七个标准:包含/排除标准,临床试验设计和随访,患者级基线特征

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号