...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical monitoring and computing >A novel system for automated propofol sedation: hybrid sedation system (HSS)
【24h】

A novel system for automated propofol sedation: hybrid sedation system (HSS)

机译:自动化异丙酚镇静的新型系统:混合镇静系统(HSS)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Closed-loop systems for propofol have been demonstrated to be safe and reliable for general anesthesia. However, no study has been conducted using a closed-loop system specifically designed for sedation in patients under spinal anesthesia. We developed an automatic anesthesia sedation system that allows for closed-loop delivery of propofol for sedation integrating a decision support system, called the hybrid sedation system (HSS). The objective of this study is to compare this system with standard practice. One hundred fifty patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups: HSS-Group (N = 75), in which propofol was administered using a closed-loop system; Control Group (N = 75), in which propofol was delivered manually. The clinical performance of the propofol sedation control is defined as efficacy to maintain bispectral index (BIS) near 65. The clinical control was called 'Excellent', 'Good', 'Poor' and 'Inadequate' with BIS values within 10 %, from 11 to 20 %, 21 to 30 %, or greater than 30 % of the BIS target of 65, respectively. The controller performance was evaluated using Varvel's parameters. Data are presented as mean +/- standard deviation, groups were compared using t test or Chi square test, P < 0.05. Clinical performance of sedation showed 'Excellent' control in the HSS-group for a significantly longer period of time (49 vs. 26 % in the control group, P < 0.0001). 'Poor' and 'Inadequate' sedation was significantly shorter in the HSS Group compared to the Control Group (11 and 10 % vs. 20 and 18 %, respectively, P < 0.0001). The novel, closed-loop system for propofol sedation showed better maintenance of the target BIS value compared to manual administration.
机译:对于全身麻醉,已经证明了用于异丙酚的闭环系统是安全可靠的。然而,没有使用专门设计用于脊柱麻醉患者镇静的闭环系统进行研究。我们开发了一种自动麻醉镇静系统,允许闭环封闭镇静的镇静镇静,用于镇静的决策支持系统,称为混合镇静系统(HSS)。本研究的目的是将该系统与标准做法进行比较。注册一百五十名患者并随机分配到两组:HSS-GROUP(n = 75),其中使用闭环系统施用异丙酚;对照组(N = 75),其中手动递送异丙酚。异丙酚镇静对照的临床表现定义为维持双光谱指数(BIS)接近65的功效。临床对照被称为“优秀”,“良好”,“差”和“不足”,并在10%以内的BIS值,来自11至20%,21%,21%至30%,或大于65的双靶的30%。使用Varvel的参数评估控制器性能。数据以平均值+/-标准偏差呈现,使用T检验或CHI方检验进行比较,P <0.05。镇静的临床表现显示HSS-GROUP中的“优异”对照,其时间明显更长的时间(49与对照组中的26%,P <0.0001)。与对照组(11和10%与20%和18%,P <0.0001)相比,HSS组在HSS组中较差的“差”和“不足”镇静明显缩短。与手动给药相比,用于异丙酚镇静的新颖的闭环系统显示出更好地维持目标双值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号