...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology >Postprocedural LGE‐CMR comparison of laser and radiofrequency ablation lesions after pulmonary vein isolation
【24h】

Postprocedural LGE‐CMR comparison of laser and radiofrequency ablation lesions after pulmonary vein isolation

机译:肺静脉隔离后激光和射频消融病变的后特性LGE-CMR比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Abstract Introduction The purpose of this study was to compare the anatomical characteristics of scar formation achieved by visual‐guided laser balloon (Laser) and radiofrequency (RF) pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), using late‐gadolinium‐enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (LGE‐CMR). Methods and results We included 17 patients with paroxysmal or early persistent drug resistant AF who underwent Laser ablation; 2 were excluded due to procedure‐related complications. The sample was matched with a historical group of 15 patients who underwent PVI using RF. LGE‐CMR sequences were acquired before and 3 months post‐PVI. Ablation gaps were defined as pulmonary vein (PV) perimeter sections showing no gadolinium enhancement. The number of ablation gaps was lower in Laser versus RF ablations (median 7?vs. 14, P??=??0.015). Complete anatomical PVI (circumferential scar around PV, without gaps) was more frequently achieved with Laser than with RF (39%?vs. 19% of PVs, P??=??0.025). Fewer gaps were present at the superior and anterior left PV and posterior right PV antral regions in the Laser group, compared to RF. Scar extension into the PVs was similar in both groups, although RF produced more extensive ablation scar toward the LA body. AF recurrences at 1 year were similar in both groups (Laser 36%?vs. RF 27%, P??=??1.00). Conclusions Compared to RF, Laser ablation achieved more complete anatomical PVI, with less LA scar extension. However, AF recurrence appears to be similar after Laser compared to RF ablation. Further studies are needed to assess whether the anatomical advantages of Laser ablation translate into clinical benefit in patients with AF.
机译:摘要引言本研究的目的是使用晚期钆增强的心磁共振成像进行比较视觉引导激光球囊(激光)和射频(RF)肺静脉分离(PVI)实现的瘢痕形成的解剖学特性(LGE -cmr)。方法和结果我们包括17名患有激光烧蚀的阵发性或早期持续耐药的患者; 2由于程序相关的并发症而被排除在外。将样品与使用RF接受PVI的15名患者的历史组合。在PVI之前和3个月之前获得LGE-CMR序列。消融差距被定义为显示没有钆增强的肺静脉(PV)周边部分。激光与射频消融的烧蚀间隙的数量较低(中位数7?vs.14,p ?? = ?? 0.015)。激光器比RF(39%ΔVs,pvs,pvs,p≤2.025)更频繁地实现了完整的解剖PVI(围绕PV,没有间隙,没有间隙,没有间隙,没有间隙,没有间隙)。与RF相比,在激光组中的上部左侧PV和前右侧PV和右侧右侧PV Antral区出现较少的间隙。疤痕延伸进入PVS在两个组中相似,但RF为LA体产生了更广泛的消融瘢痕。在1年内的AF复发在两组中相似(激光36%?vs。rf 27%,p ?? 1.00)。结论与RF相比,激光消融达到了更完整的解剖PVI,较少的La疤痕延伸。然而,与RF消融相比,激光后,AF复发似乎是相似的。需要进一步的研究来评估激光消融的解剖学优势是否转化为AF患者的临床益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号