...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of child psychology and psychiatry >SWAN SWAN scale for ADHD ADHD trait‐based genetic research: a validity and polygenic risk study
【24h】

SWAN SWAN scale for ADHD ADHD trait‐based genetic research: a validity and polygenic risk study

机译:基于ADHD ADHD特质的遗传研究的天鹅天鹅规模:有效性和多基因风险研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background Population‐based samples with valid, quantitative and genetically informative trait measures of psychopathology could be a powerful complement to case/control genetic designs. We report the convergent and predictive validity of the parent‐ and self‐report versions of the Strengths and Weaknesses of ADHD Symptoms and Normal Behavior Rating Scale (S WAN ). We tested if SWAN scores were associated with ADHD diagnosis, ADHD polygenic risk, as well as traits and polygenic risk for disorders that co‐occur with ADHD : anxiety and obsessive‐compulsive disorder ( OCD ). Methods We collected parent‐ and self‐report SWAN scores in a sample of 15,560 children and adolescents (6–17?years) recruited at a science museum (Spit for Science sample). We established age and sex norms for the SWAN . Sensitivity‐specificity analyses determined SWAN cut‐points that discriminated those with and without a reported ADHD diagnosis. These cut‐points were validated in a clinic sample (266 ADHD cases; 36 controls). Convergent validity was established using the Conners’ parent‐ and self‐report scales. Using Spit for Science participants with genome‐wide data ( n ?=?5,154), we tested if low, medium and high SWAN scores were associated with polygenic risk for ADHD , OCD and anxiety disorders. Results Parent‐ and self‐report SWAN scores showed high convergent validity with Conners’ scales and distinguished ADHD participants with high sensitivity and specificity in the Spit for Science sample. In a clinic sample, the Spit for Science cut‐points discriminated ADHD cases from controls with a sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 92%. High SWAN scores and scores above the Spit for Science cut‐points were significantly associated with polygenic risk for ADHD . SWAN scores were not associated with polygenic risk for OCD or anxiety disorders. Conclusions Our study supports the validity of the parent‐ and self‐report SWAN scales and their potential in ADHD population‐based genetic research.
机译:背景技术具有有效,定量和基因信息性特性措施的基于群体的样本可能是对案例/控制遗传设计的强大补充。我们报告了父母和自我报告版本的父母和自我报告版本的收敛和预测有效性和正常行为评级规模的优势和劣势。我们测试了SWAN评分与ADHD诊断,ADHD多种子基风险以及与ADHD共同发生的疾病的特征和多基因风险,以及焦虑和强迫症(OCD)。方法在一个科学博物馆招募的15,560名儿童和青少年(6-17岁)(6-17岁)(吐科学样本)的样本中,我们收集了父母和自我报告的SWAN分数。我们为天鹅建立了年龄和性别规范。敏感性特异性分析确定的天鹅切割点,这些削减点鉴定有和没有报告的ADHD诊断。这些切片在临床样品中验证(266例; 36例控件)。使用Conners的亲本和自我报告尺度建立收敛有效性。使用基因组数据的科学参与者使用Spit(n?=?5,154),如果低,中和高天鹅分数与ADHD,OCD和焦虑症的多基因风险有关。结果父母和自我报告的SWAN分数显示了高收敛有效性,康纳斯的尺度和尊重了吐痰吐痰的ADHD参与者,吐出科学样本。在临床样本中,科学切片点的唾液鉴定了敏感性的ADHD病例,灵敏度为84%和92%的特异性。高于科学切片吐痰的高世俗评分和得分与ADHD的多基因风险显着相关。天鹅评分与OCD或焦虑症的多基因风险无关。结论我们的研究支持亲本和自我报告的遗传级别的有效性及其在基于ADHD人口的遗传研究中的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号