...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology >A comparison of regorafenib and fruquintinib for metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
【24h】

A comparison of regorafenib and fruquintinib for metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

机译:Regorafenib和Fruquintinib对转移结直肠癌的比较:系统审查与网络元分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background The optimal treatment in the third-line and later-line setting for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has not been established. As reported, regorafenib and fruquintinib have shown to be superior to placebo in mCRC. However, no direct clinical comparison of regorafenib and fruquintinib has been conducted; we performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of regorafenib and fruquintinib. Methods PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched and randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect and safety of regorafenib or fruquintinib versus placebo for patients with mCRC were included. Two investigators independently searched articles, extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies. After that, we performed pairwise direct meta-analyses (regorafenib vs. placebo and fruquintinib vs. placebo) and indirect comparison (regorafenib vs. fruquintinib) using network meta-analyses methods. Results Three RCTs involving 1380 patients were included in the meta-analysis. In the direct meta-analysis, regorafenib and fruquintinib both showed survival benefits when compared with placebo. For the indirect comparison, fruquintinib shows no significant difference in OS compared to regorafenib (HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.64-1.46). Regarding PFS, there was a tendency that fruquintinib was superior to regorafenib (HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.39-1.08); however, there was no statistic difference. For the safety analysis, in indirect comparison, fruquintinib showed significant difference in all-grade toxicity compared to regorafenib (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.65-0.82), especially in subgroup of proteinuria (OR 0.31; 95% CI 0.11-0.86). For the grade 3-5 toxicity, fruquintinib showed no significant difference when compared with regorafenib (OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.64-1.32). Conclusion Based on efficacy and safety, there was a tendency that fruquintinib was superior to regorafenib, as a whole, regorafenib and fruquintinib demonstrated similar clinical benefit for patients with refractory mCRC. It seems that fruquintinib has less toxic in all-grade toxicity when compared with regorafenib.
机译:背景技术尚未确定转移结直肠癌(MCRC)的第三线和后延线设置中的最佳处理。如报道所示,Regorafenib和Fruquintinib显示出在MCRC中优于安慰剂。但是,没有进行较高的临床临床比较和Fruquintinib的直接临床比较;我们进行了系统审查和网络元分析,以比较令人疣的脊髓酰胺和Fruquintinib的疗效和安全性。方法有系统地搜索PubMed,Embase和Cochrane文库,包括评估MCRC患者的Regorafenib或Fruquintinib与安慰剂的随机对照试验(RCT)。两位调查员独立搜查文章,提取数据,并评估包括研究的质量。之后,我们使用网络元分析方法进行成对直接元分析(RegorafeNib与安慰剂和Fruquintinib Vs.PlaceBo)和间接比较(RegoraFenib与Fruquintinib)。结果涉及1380名患者的三个RCT被纳入META分析。在与安慰剂相比,在直接荟萃分析中,Regorafenib和Fruquintinib均显示出生存益处。对于间接比较,与Regorafenib(HR 0.97; 95%CI 0.64-1.46)相比,Fruquintinib没有显着差异。关于PFS,Fruquintinib的趋势优于Regorafenib(HR 0.65; 95%CI 0.39-1.08);但是,没有统计学差异。对于安全性分析,在间接比较中,与Regorafenib(或0.73; 95%CI 0.65-0.82)相比,Fruquintinib对所有级毒性的显着差异,特别是在蛋白尿(或0.31; 95%CI 0.11-0.86)的亚组中。对于3-5级的毒性,与术术(或0.92; 95%CI 0.64-1.32)相比,Fruquintinib显示出没有显着差异。结论基于疗效和安全性,趋势使得Fruquintinib优于Regorafenib,整体而言,Regorafenib和Fruquintinib对难治性MCRC患者的临床益处相似。与RegoraFenib相比,果冻尼对所有级毒的毒性较小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号