...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cancer education: the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education >The Quality of Patient Information Booklets for Cancer Patientsan Evaluation of Free Accessible Material in German Language
【24h】

The Quality of Patient Information Booklets for Cancer Patientsan Evaluation of Free Accessible Material in German Language

机译:癌症患者的患者信息册的质量评估德语的自由无障碍材料

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

According to the information-seeking behaviors of patients, booklets which can be downloaded from the Internet for free are an important source of information notably for patients with cancer. This study investigated whether information booklets for patients with cancer available at German websites are in accordance with the formal and content criteria of evidence-based information. We compared and compiled both content and formal criteria by matching different national and international standards for written patient information using a merged instrument. A catalog with a total of 16 items within 4 categories (quality of the publication, quality of information, quality of information representation, and transparency) was created. Patient information booklets for the most frequent tumor types were collected from the Internet. A total of 52 different patient booklets were downloaded and assessed. Overall, no booklet fulfilled all criteria. The quality of the publications was evaluated with an average value of 1.67 while the quality of the information had a mean value of 1.45, and the quality of information presentation had a similar rating (1.39). The transparency criteria were evaluated as lowest with an average of 1.07. In summary, German booklets for cancer patients have some shortcomings concerning formal and content criteria for evidence-based patient information. The applied requirement catalog is suitable for wide use and may help in quality assurance of health information. It may be used as part of an obligatory external evaluation, which could help improving the quality of health information.
机译:根据患者的信息寻求行为,可以免费下载的小册子是癌症患者的重要信息来源。本研究调查了德国网站上可用癌症患者的信息册是否符合正式和内容的证据信息标准。我们通过使用合并仪器匹配书面患者信息的不同国家和国际标准进行比较和编译内容和正式标准。创建了一个目录,共有16个项目中的16项(出版质量,信息质量,信息表示质量和透明度)。从互联网收集最常见的肿瘤类型的患者信息小册子。下载并评估了共有52个不同的患者小册子。总的来说,没有小册子符合所有标准。出版物的质量被评估,平均值为1.67,而信息质量的平均值为1.45,信息呈现质量具有类似的评级(1.39)。透明度标准评估为平均1.07的最低。总之,癌症患者的德国本票对循证患者信息有一些关于正式和内容标准的缺点。所应用的要求目录适用于广泛使用,并有助于质量保证健康信息。它可以作为强制性外部评估的一部分,这有助于提高健康信息的质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号