...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiac surgery. >Association between surgical volume and clinical outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting in contemporary practice
【24h】

Association between surgical volume and clinical outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting in contemporary practice

机译:冠状动脉旁路在当代实践中冠状动脉旁路嫁接后手术量和临床结果的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract Background Studies assessing the association between surgical volume and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) outcomes yielded conflicting results. Given the substantial recent decrease in CABG volume, we sough to examine the volume‐outcomes effect in contemporary practice. Methods The National Readmission Database was queried to identify patients undergoing CABG between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2016. Risk‐adjusted in‐hospital morbidity, mortality, length‐of‐stay, cost, and 30‐day readmission were compared between low‐, intermediate‐, and high‐volume centers. Results A total of 411?159 CABG hospitalizations at 1558 hospitals were included. Hospitals were classified into three tertiles (high??250, intermediate 100‐250, and low‐volume??100). Hospitals in the highest tertile (n?=?568) performed 73.9% of all CABG operations, while those in the intermediate (n?=?452), and low (n?=?538) volume tertiles performed only 21.7% and 4.4% of all CABGs, respectively. The median number of CABGs performed at high‐, intermediate‐, and low‐volume hospitals was 45?316?335, respectively. After risk adjustment, undergoing CABG at low‐ or intermediate‐ volume hospital (vs high‐volume hospitals) was associated with higher in‐hospital death (odd ratio [OR]?=?1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19‐1.44, and OR?=?1.11, 95% CI, 1.05‐1.17, respectively, P ??.001). Similarly, adjusted odds of stroke, acute kidney injury, and blood transfusion were higher at low‐ and intermediate‐volume centers compared with high‐volume centers. Undergoing CABG at a low‐volume center was associated with 50% higher adjusted cost and 77% higher adjusted 30‐day readmissions. Conclusions In contemporary practice, in which one‐third of CABG‐capable hospitals perform??100 CABG operations annually, a strong relationship is observed between surgical volume and adjusted in‐hospital morbidity, mortality, cost, and 30‐day readmission.
机译:抽象背景研究评估外科体积和冠状动脉旁路接枝(CABG)结果之间的关联产生的结果相互矛盾。鉴于最近最近的CABG体积减少,我们呼出以检查当代实践中的体积结果。方法询问国家入院数据库鉴定2016年1月1日至2016年12月31日之间接受CABG的患者。风险调整后的内医院发病率,死亡率,住院长度,成本和30天的入院在低位之间进行了比较 - 中级和高批量中心。结果共有411次(159名CABG住院,包括1558家医院。医院被分为三个截头位(高Δ&α250,中间体100-250和低容量Δ10)。在最高的Tertile(n?=?568)中的医院进行了所有CABG操作的73.9%,而中间(N?=Δ552)的那些,低(n?=Δ538)的体积效率仅执行21.7%和4.4分别为所有CABG的百分比。在高,中间 - 和低容量医院执行的CABG的中位数分别为45?316?335。在风险调整后,在低级或中间医院(VS大容量医院)的CABG与较高的医院死亡(奇数比例[或] =?1.31,95%置信区间[CI],1.19- 1.44,和或?=?1.11,95%CI,1.05-1.7,分别p≤00.001)。同样,与高批量中心相比,中间体积中心的中风,急性肾脏损伤和输血的调节次数较高。在低批量中心接收的CABG与调整成本更高的50%,调整为30天的阅览率高77%。在当代实践中的结论,其中三分之一的CABG能力的医院表现了?&?100个CABG操作每年进行,手术量之间观察到强烈的关系,并在医院内发病率调整,死亡率,成本和30天的入院。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号