首页> 外文期刊>Journal of burn care & research: official publication of the American Burn Association >Burn Surgeon and Palliative Care Physician Attitudes Regarding Goals of Care Delineation for Burned Geriatric Patients
【24h】

Burn Surgeon and Palliative Care Physician Attitudes Regarding Goals of Care Delineation for Burned Geriatric Patients

机译:烧焦外科医生和姑息治疗医师关于烧伤老年患者的护理目标目标的态度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Palliative care specialists (PCS) and burn surgeons (BS) were surveyed regarding: 1) importance of goals of care (GoC) conversations for burned seniors; 2) confidence in their own specialty's ability to conduct these conversations; and 3) confidence in the ability of the other specialty to do so. A 13-item survey was developed by the steering committee of a multicenter consortium dedicated to palliative care in the injured geriatric patient and beta-tested by BS and PCS unaffiliated with the consortium. The finalized instrument was electronically circulated to active physician members of the American Burn Association and American Academy for Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Forty-five BS (7.3%) and 244 PCS (5.7%) responded. Palliative physicians rated being more familiar with GoC, were more comfortable having a discussion with laypeople, were more likely to have reported high-quality training in performing conversations, believed more palliative specialists were needed in intensive care units, and had more interest in conducting conversations relative to BS. Both groups believed themselves to perform GoC discussions better than the other specialty perceived them to do so. BS favored leading team discussions, whereas palliative specialists preferred jointly led discussions. Both groups agreed that discussions should occur within 72 hours of admission. Both groups believe themselves to conduct GoC discussions for burned seniors better than the other specialty perceived them to do so, which led to disparate views on perceptions for the optimal leadership of these discussions.
机译:姑息治疗专家(PC)和烧伤外科医生(BS)进行了调查:1)烧毁老年人的护理目标(GOC)对话的重要性; 2)对自己专业进行这些谈话的能力的信心; 3)对其他专业能力的信心。一项13项调查是由致力于在受伤的老年患者中姑息治疗的多中心联盟的指导委员会开发了13项调查,并由BS和PC与联盟无粘贴的BSA测试。最终的仪器被电子方式传播到美国烧伤协会和美国临终关怀和姑息医学院的活动医师成员。四十五个BS(7.3%)和244台PC(5.7%)响应。群体的医生们更熟悉GOC,更乐意与游牧人民进行讨论,更有可能报告在执行对话方面的高质量培训,相信更多在重症监护单位中需要更多的姑息专家,并且对进行对话更有兴趣相对于BS。两组都相信自己比认为他们所做的其他专业更好地进行GOC讨论。 BS有利于领先的团队讨论,而姑息专家首选联合LED讨论。两组都同意讨论应在入院的72小时内发生。两组都相信自己比其他专业对烧毁的老年人进行GOC讨论,这导致对这些讨论的最佳领导的看法贬低了看法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号