...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of burn care & research: official publication of the American Burn Association >Hydrocodone, but Neither Morphine nor Oxycodone, Is Effective in Suppressing Burn-Induced Mechanical Allodynia in the Uninjured Foot Contralateral to the Burn
【24h】

Hydrocodone, but Neither Morphine nor Oxycodone, Is Effective in Suppressing Burn-Induced Mechanical Allodynia in the Uninjured Foot Contralateral to the Burn

机译:氢转酮,但既不是吗啡也不是羟考酮,有效地抑制燃烧的止血脚对侧对烧伤的燃烧诱导的机械异常疼痛

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Opioids are commonly used to treat severe, burn-induced pain. However, there is a lack of rodent studies that examine the differential effects of various opioids on burn pain. We recently demonstrated that hydrocodone was superior to other opioids in suppressing the development of burn-induced mechanical allodynia in the burned limb. This study monitored the development of mechanical allodynia and compared the abilities of morphine, oxycodone, and hydrocodone to reduce burn-induced mechanical allodynia in the limb contralateral to the burn. Mice were examined for their baseline pain sensitivity thresholds using the von Frey filaments test. Then, they were subjected to burn or sham injury and treated orally with morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone (20 or 40 mg/kg), or saline twice daily throughout the study. They were retested on days 4, 7, 11, 14, 21, and 28 postburn. Hyperalgesia was developed in the contralateral, uninjured foot beginning 21 days after the burn injury. Hydrocodone was effective in suppressing the development of burn-induced mechanical allodynia. In contrast, morphine and oxycodone had only minimal effects on the development of burn-induced mechanical allodynia. The abnormal pain sensitivities that develop as a result of burn injuries are very difficult to treat and remain a significant public health problem. More rodent studies are required to improve our understanding of the differences among the currently available opioid analgesics in order to optimize the care provided to burn victims as well as those suffering from other pain modalities.
机译:阿片类药物通常用于治疗严重灼伤的疼痛。然而,缺乏啮齿动物的研究,检查各种阿片类药物对烧伤的差异影响。我们最近展示了氢码酮优于其他阿片类药物,用于抑制烧伤肢体中的烧伤诱导的机械异常疼痛的发展。本研究监测了机械异常性疼痛的发展,并比较了吗啡,羟考酮和氢致铬的能力,以减少燃烧肢体中肢体诱导的机械异常性疼痛。使用Von Frey丝锥试验检查其基线疼痛敏感性阈值的小鼠。然后,将它们进行烧伤或假损伤,并用吗啡,羟考酮,氢酮(20或40mg / kg)口服治疗,或在整个研究中每天两次治疗。他们在第4,7,11,14,21天和28天的销售后重新打了。血腥血管痛过敏,在烧伤后21天开始在对侧,未加注的脚。氢化酮有效地抑制烧伤诱导的机械异常疼痛的发展。相比之下,吗啡和羟考酮对烧伤诱导的机械异常性有害的发展效果很小。由于烧伤伤害而产生的异常疼痛敏感性非常难以治疗,并且仍然是一个重要的公共卫生问题。需要更多的啮齿动物研究来改善我们对目前可用的阿片类药物镇痛药中的差异的理解,以优化提供给烧伤受害者的护理以及患有其他止痛方式的人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号