首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume >Comparison of Direct Perioperative Costs in Treatment of Unstable Distal Radial Fractures Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning
【24h】

Comparison of Direct Perioperative Costs in Treatment of Unstable Distal Radial Fractures Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning

机译:直接围手术期成本治疗不稳定远端径向骨折开放性降低和内固定与闭合减小和经皮钉扎的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: As the United States transitions to value-based insurance, bundled payments, and capitated models, it is paramount to understand health-care costs and resource utilization. The financial implications of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with a volar locking plate for management of unstable distal radial fractures have not been established. We aimed to elucidate cost differences between ORIF and closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP). Our hypothesis was that ORIF has greater direct perioperative costs than CRPP but that the costs equilibrate over time.
机译:背景:随着美国转向基于价值的保险,捆绑的付款和合作模式,可以了解医疗保健成本和资源利用至关重要。 没有建立开放减少和内固定(ORIF)的财务影响,概述了用于管理不稳定的远端径向骨折的持久锁定板。 我们旨在阐明厄夫和闭合减少和经皮钉(CRPP)之间的成本差异。 我们的假设是orif比CRPP更直接的直接围手术成本,但成本随着时间的推移平衡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号