首页> 外文期刊>The journal of asthma >Impact of shared decision making on asthma quality of life and asthma control among children
【24h】

Impact of shared decision making on asthma quality of life and asthma control among children

机译:共同决策对儿童哮喘生命与哮喘控制的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective: Few studies have examined the effectiveness of shared decision making (SDM) in clinical practice. This study evaluated the impact of SDM on quality of life and symptom control in children with asthma. Methods: We conducted a prospective 3-year study in six community-based practices serving a low-income patient population. Practices received training on SDM using an evidence-based toolkit. Patients aged 2-17 with a diagnosis of asthma were identified from scheduling and billing data. At approximate 6-month intervals, patients completed a survey consisting of the Mini Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (range 1-7) and the control domain of the Pediatric Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire (range 0-7). We used propensity scores to match 46 children receiving SDM to 46 children receiving usual care with decision support. Included children had completed a baseline survey and at least one follow-up survey. Random coefficient models incorporated repeated measures to assess the effect of SDM on asthma quality of life and asthma control. Results: The sample was primarily of non-White patients (94.6%) with Medicaid insurance (92.4%). Receipt of SDM using an evidence-based toolkit was associated with higher asthma quality of life [mean difference 0.9; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4-1,4] and fewer asthma control problems (mean difference -0.9; 95% CI -1.6-0.2) compared to usual care with decision support. Conclusions: Implementation of SDM within clinical practices using a standardized toolkit is associated with improved asthma quality of life and asthma control for low-income children with asthma when compared to usual care with decision support.
机译:目的:少数研究审查了临床实践中共享决策(SDM)的有效性。本研究评估了SDM对哮喘儿童的生活质量和症状控制的影响。方法:在六个社区为基础的实践中进行了一项潜在的3年度研究,提供了低收入患者人口。使用基于证据的工具包对SDM培训接受了练习。 2-17岁的患者从调度和计费数据鉴定患者诊断。在6个月间隔近似,患者完成了一项调查,该调查由迷你儿科哮喘质量的生命问卷(范围1-7)和儿科哮喘治疗评估问卷调查问卷(范围0-7)组成。我们使用倾向于匹配46名儿童接受SDM到46名儿童接受常规关心的决策支持。包含的儿童已完成基线调查和至少一个后续调查。随机系数模型掺入重复措施,以评估SDM对生命哮喘质量和哮喘控制的影响。结果:样品主要是非白色患者(94.6%),医疗补助保险(92.4%)。使用基于证据的工具包收到SDM与哮喘的哮喘质量较高[平均0.9; 95%置信区间(CI)0.4-1,4]和哮喘控制问题的较少(平均差异-0.9; 95%CI -1.6-0.2)与通常的决策支持相比。结论:使用标准化工具包的临床实践中的SDM实施与哮喘的低收入儿童的哮喘哮喘患者的哮喘质量和哮喘控制有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号