...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of asthma >Offline exhaled nitric oxide in emergency department and subsequent acute asthma control.
【24h】

Offline exhaled nitric oxide in emergency department and subsequent acute asthma control.

机译:离线呼出急诊部的一氧化氮和随后的急性哮喘控制。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated exhaled NO measurement during acute asthma. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate exhaled NO fraction (FE(NO)) and peak expiratory flow (PEF) time-courses during acute asthma treatment (beta 2-agonist plus systemic steroid) and to assess whether FE(NO) time-course predicts subsequent asthma control. METHODS: Sixty-five asthmatic patients (mean +/- SD, 34 +/- 10 years) were prospectively enrolled in three Emergency Departments. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were excluded (failure of offline FE(NO) measurement at 100 mL/s [FE(NO 0.1)], n = 4, and early discharge). The 49 remaining patients performed FE(NO 0.1) and PEF on admission, at the 2nd (H2) and 6th hour (H6). Follow-up using an Asthma Control Diary was obtained in 27 of 49 patients, whether they were hospitalized (n = 9) or discharged (n = 18). All but 2 patients had elevated FE(NO) on admission (median [interquartile], 49 [26-78] ppb). Unlike PEF, mean FE(NO 0.1) of our sample was not significantly modified by treatment. No significant relationship was evidenced between exhaled NO and PEF variations. The variation of FE(NO 0.1) [H0 minus H6] was different in patients who were hospitalized (decrease of 8 +/- 20 ppb) versus discharged (increase of 5 +/- 20 ppb, p = 0.04). This variation of FE(NO 0.1) was correlated with the Diary score (control of subsequent week), an initial increase in FE(NO 0.1) being associated with better asthma control. Nevertheless, neither exhaled NO nor PEFR were good predictors of asthma control. CONCLUSIONS: An increase in FE(NO) is observed in almost all patients with acute asthma, and its subsequent increase within 6 hours is associated with a better degree of asthma control in the subsequent week.
机译:背景:在急性哮喘期间,很少评估呼出的呼出量没有测量。目的:评估急性哮喘治疗(Beta 2-激动剂加上全身类固醇的呼出(Fe(NO))和峰呼气流(PEF)时间课程,并评估FE(不)时间过程预测后续哮喘控制。方法:六十五名哮喘患者(平均+/- SD,34 +/- 10岁)均持前注册三个急诊部门。结果:排除了16名患者(离线Fe(NO)测量在100mL / s [Fe(NO 0.1)],n = 4和早期排出)中失败的49名剩余的患者在入院时进行Fe(NO 0.1)和PEF,在2ND(H2)和第6小时(H6)。在49名患者的27例中获得使用哮喘控制日记的随访,无论是住院(n = 9)还是放电(n = 18)。除2名患者的所有患者均升高(NO)(NO)(中位数[interquartile],49 [26-78] PPB)。与PEF不同,通过治疗没有显着修饰样品的平均值(NO 0.1)。在呼出的否和PEF变化之间没有显着的关系。 Fe(NO 0.1)[H0 minus H6]的变异在住院(减少8 +/-20ppb)与排出(增加5 +/-20 ppb,p = 0.04)。该Fe(NO 0.1)的这种变化与日记评分相关(随后的一周的控制),与更好的哮喘控制有关的Fe(NO 0.1)的初始增加。尽管如此,呼出的不良和PEFR都不是哮喘控制的良好预测因子。结论:在几乎所有急性哮喘患者中观察到Fe(NO)的增加,其随后在6小时内增加,随后的一周内与更好的哮喘控制相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号