首页> 外文期刊>Journal of behavioral education >Headsprout: A Systematic Review of the Evidence
【24h】

Headsprout: A Systematic Review of the Evidence

机译:头布邮政:对证据的系统审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Reading is a crucial skill for students to develop, not only as they enter school but also as they continue throughout K-12 education. Computer-assisted instruction (CAI) is one means of providing supplemental support for students to build the foundational key areas of reading-so they can use reading to learn in later schooling years. One such CAI program that exists in the marketplace is Headsprout, which includes both an Early Reading and Reading Comprehension component. To date, no peer-reviewed studies have conducted a systematic review of the effectiveness of Headsprout on the five key areas of reading in the school setting. The most recent governmental review was completed almost a decade ago. As such, the purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the existing literature base to determine the level of evidence for each component's effectiveness on each of the key areas of reading and identify existing avenues of future research. Results indicated tentative support for both components in some of the key areas of reading based on effect sizes, though there were a limited number of studies and the methodological rigor of included studies did not always meet What Works Clearinghouse standards. Implications for educators and researchers are discussed.
机译:阅读是学生开发的重要技能,不仅在他们进入学校而且在整个K-12教育中继续。计算机辅助指令(CAI)是为学生提供补充支持的一种方法,以建立阅读的基础关键领域 - 因此他们可以在以后的学校教育年内使用阅读来学习。在市场中存在的这种CAI程序是展望工厂,其包括早期阅读和阅读理解组件。迄今为止,没有对同行评审的研究进行了系统审查,对校长在学校设定中阅读五个关键领域的脑权工程有效性审查。最近的政府评论差不多十年前完成。因此,该系统审查的目的是评估现有的文学基础,以确定每个组成部分的效率的证据水平,并确定未来研究的现有途径。结果表明,基于效果大小的一些关键读数的组件的暂定支持,尽管研究数量有限,所包含的研究的方法学严格并不总是满足清算所标准的工作。讨论了对教育工作者和研究人员的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号