首页> 外文期刊>Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry >Examining the effects of punishment schedule density on the development and maintenance of avoidance and safety behaviours: Implications for exposure therapies
【24h】

Examining the effects of punishment schedule density on the development and maintenance of avoidance and safety behaviours: Implications for exposure therapies

机译:检查惩罚计划密度对避免和安全行为发展和维护的影响:对暴露疗法的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background and objectivesEngaging in safety behaviors in the absence of actual threat is a key feature of many psychological disorders, including OCD and depression. Failure to discriminate between threatening and safe environments may make these behaviors resistant to change. The purpose of the current study is to investigate the conditions under which avoidance and safety behaviors are developed and maintained. MethodsIn experiment 1, sixty-seven participants who were initially screened for low obsessive-compulsive behavior were invited to play a computerized game to gain points and avoid their potential loss. In Phase 1, they were exposed to a lean punishment schedule (relatively frequent point losses) and a dense schedule (highly frequent point losses). In Phase 2, they were tested on engagement in safety behaviors, where no punishment had been programmed. In experiment 2, twenty-two new participants were exposed to the lean punishment schedule followed immediately by the no point loss condition (Phase 2), one and two weeks after their initial exposure to the punishment conditions to test for the maintenance of safety behavior over time. ResultsFindings demonstrated that participants developed avoidance immediately, but safety behavior was developed and maintained only for those who were exposed to the lean punishment schedule. LimitationsProlonged exposure to dense punishment schedules may yield different results because the contrast between safe and aversive environments may be less discernible. ConclusionsThese findings are important because they provide experimental evidence on the conditions that render safety behaviors difficult to amend, and offer important recommendations for clinical practice.
机译:在没有实际威胁的情况下,安全行为中的背景和对象是许多心理障碍,包括强迫和抑郁的关键特征。未能区分威胁和安全环境可能会使这些行为抵抗变化。目前研究的目的是研究避免和安全行为的避免和维护的条件。 MethaSIN实验1,邀请最初筛选出低强迫强迫行为的六十七名参与者播放计算机化游戏以获得积分并避免其潜在的损失。在第1阶段,将它们暴露于贫惩罚时间表(相对频繁的点损失)和密集的时间表(高度频繁的点损失)。在第2阶段,他们在安全行为的参与下进行了测试,在那里没有被编制惩罚。在实验2中,将二十二名新参与者暴露于贫民刑罚时间表,然后立即通过无点损失条件(第2阶段),初步接触处罚条件后一两周,为维持安全行为的惩罚条件时间。结果武容证明,参与者立即开发避免,但仅对那些暴露于贫民刑罚时间表的人开发和维护安全行为。局限性的惩罚调查时间表可能会产生不同的结果,因为安全和厌恶环境之间的对比度可能不那么可辨别。结论STERHESE的结果很重要,因为它们提供了对难以修订安全行为的条件的实验证据,并为临床实践提供重要建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号