首页> 外文期刊>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics >Time-lapse imaging systems in IVF laboratories: a French national survey
【24h】

Time-lapse imaging systems in IVF laboratories: a French national survey

机译:IVF实验室中的时间流逝成像系统:法国国家调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PurposeAlthough the clinical value of time-lapse imaging (TLI) systems in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles is still debated, its prevalence worldwide seems to be expanding. The situation of TLI in the USA has been recently surveyed, but these results might not be transposable to other countries with different IVF regulation and funding such as France. This study evaluated the TLI situation in French IVF laboratories.MethodsAn anonymous online cross-sectional survey was sent by email to 210 embryologists in September and October 2017. Laboratories, demographics, TLI clinical use, purchasing plan, and embryologists' opinions were analyzed using logistic regression to calculate odds ratio.ResultsOf the 210 lab directors surveyed, 78 responded (37.1%), 43 (55%) working in private IVF laboratories and 35 (45%) in public hospitals. Thirty (38.5%) were TLI users. The odds of TLI possession were not statistically different according to laboratory sector or size. Most embryologists (n=21, 70%) used TLI for unselected patients. Cost was the main reason given by non-users for not implementing TLI (n=24, 50%). Most respondents were convinced that TLI is superior to standard morphology (n=52, 73.2%) and that TLI improves culture conditions (n=62, 84.9%). However, half (n=39, 54.9%) indicated that evidence was still lacking to assert TLI clinical usefulness.ConclusionThe prevalence of TLI systems and embryologists' opinion in France was slightly different from the American situation. The different regulation and funding policy might account for some differences in terms of TLI use and perception.
机译:Purposeuctough在体外施肥(IVF)周期中的时间流逝成像(TLI)系统的临床价值仍讨论,其普遍存在似乎是扩大的。最近调查了美国TLI的情况,但这些结果可能无法转让给其他国家的其他国家,不同的IVF监管和资金,如法国。本研究评估了法国IVF实验室的TLI情况。匿名匿名在线横断面调查由电子邮件至2017年9月和10月举行了210次胚胎学家。使用Logistic分析了实验室,人口统计学,TLI临床用途,采购计划和胚胎文学家的意见回归计算赔率比率。调查的210个实验室董事的资料,78次应对(37.1%),43(55%)在私人IVF实验室工作,35(45%)在公立医院工作。三十(38.5%)是TLI用户。根据实验室部门或大小,TLI占有的几率没有统计学不同。大多数胚胎学家(n = 21,70%)用于未选择的患者的TLI。费用是非用户不实施TLI(n = 24,50%)的主要原因。大多数受访者都相信TLI优于标准形态(n = 52,73.2%),并且TLI改善了培养条件(n = 62,84.9%)。然而,一半(n = 39,54.9%)表明证据仍然缺乏TLI临床有用率。结论TLI系统和胚胎学家在法国的意见与美国情况略有不同。不同的监管和资金政策可能会占TLI使用和感知方面的一些差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号