...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of aging and health >A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Carer Focused and Dyadic Multicomponent Interventions for Carers of People With Dementia
【24h】

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Carer Focused and Dyadic Multicomponent Interventions for Carers of People With Dementia

机译:系统审查和荟萃分析比较Carer聚焦和多达多组分干预患者对痴呆的人的照顾者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of two approaches: multicomponent interventions that focus on working with the carer and dyadic interventions that work with both the carer and the person with dementia. Method: A systematic review involving a search of Medline, EMBASE, and PsycINFO in October 2015 was performed. Randomized controlled trials involving carers of people with dementia and comparing multicomponent interventions with usual care were included. Results: Pooling of all studies demonstrated that multicomponent interventions can reduce depressive symptoms, improve quality of life, reduce carer impact, and reduce behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia as well as caregiver upset with these symptoms. We were unable to find a significant difference in the effects of dyadic interventions in comparison with carer focused interventions for these outcomes. Discussion: Although effect sizes associated with intervention are small, multicomponent interventions are relatively inexpensive to deliver, acceptable, and widely applicable.
机译:目的:这项研究的目的是比较两种方法的疗效:专注于与护理人员和痴呆症的人合作的照顾者和二元干预措施的多组分干预措施。方法:2015年10月涉及搜索Medline,Embase和Psycinfo的系统审查。包括随机对照试验,涉及患有痴呆症的人和常规护理的多组分干预措施。结果:所有研究的汇集表明,多组分干预措施可以减少抑郁症状,提高生活质量,降低护理人员的影响,并降低痴呆的行为和心理症状,以及护理人员对这些症状不满。与这些结果的优雅干预措施相比,我们无法发现二元干预措施的影响差异。讨论:尽管与干预相关的效果大小很小,但多组分干预措施相对便宜,以提供,可接受和广泛适用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号