首页> 外文期刊>International psychogeriatrics >Do changes in coping style explain the effectiveness of interventions for psychological morbidity in family carers of people with dementia? A systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Do changes in coping style explain the effectiveness of interventions for psychological morbidity in family carers of people with dementia? A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:应对方式的改变是否解释了痴呆症患者家庭照顾者心理疾病干预措施的有效性?系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Observational studies find that family carers of people with dementia who use more emotional support and acceptance-based coping, and less dysfunctional coping, are less depressed and anxious. We hypothesized that interventions effective in reducing psychological symptoms would increase emotional support and acceptance-based coping, or decrease dysfunctional coping. Methods: We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials published up to July 2011, of interventions for carers of people with dementia measuring coping and psychological morbidity. We rated study validity and reported findings. We conducted fixed-effect meta-analyses for interventions where possible. Results: Eight of 433 papers identified by the search met inclusion criteria. All measured coping immediately after intervention. Two interventions significantly decreased depressive or anxiety symptoms: the smaller study found no change in dysfunctional coping. Neither measured emotional support and acceptance-based coping. Meta-analysis found that both group coping skills interventions alone (SMD =-0.39, 95% CI =-0.75 to-0.03, p = 0.04) and with behavioral activation (SMD =-0.26, 95% CI =-0.48 to-0.04, p = 0.02) significantly increased dysfunctional coping, while significantly reducing depressive symptoms. Positive coping (a mix of emotional and solution-focused strategies) increased (SMD = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.05-0.51, p = 0.02) with group coping skills interventions and behavioral activation. Conclusions: Contrary to our hypothesis, dysfunctional coping increased when carer depressive symptoms improved. There was preliminary evidence that emotional support and acceptance-based coping increased, as positive coping increased although solution-focused coping alone did not. More research is needed to elucidate whether successful interventions work through changing coping strategies immediately and in the longer term.
机译:背景:观察性研究发现,痴呆症患者的家庭照顾者使用更多的情绪支持和基于接受的应对方式,以及较少的机能障碍应对方式,可以减少抑郁症和焦虑症。我们假设有效减少心理症状的干预措施将增加情绪支持和基于接受的应对,或减少功能障碍的应对。方法:我们系统地回顾了截至2011年7月的随机对照试验,该试验针对痴呆症患者的照护者进行应对措施和心理疾病的干预措施。我们评估了研究的有效性并报告了发现。我们在可能的情况下对干预措施进行了固定效果的荟萃分析。结果:搜索确定的433篇论文中有8篇符合纳入标准。干预后立即测量所有应对措施。两种干预措施可显着降低抑郁或焦虑症状:较小的研究发现,功能障碍的应对措施没有改变。两者均未测量出情感支持和基于接受的应对。荟萃分析发现,两个小组的应对技巧干预措施单独(SMD = -0.39,95%CI = -0.75至-0.03,p = 0.04)和行为激活(SMD = -0.26,95%CI = -0.48至-0.04) ,p = 0.02)显着增加了功能障碍的应对,同时显着减轻了抑郁症状。通过小组应对技巧干预和行为激活,积极应对(情绪和解决方案策略的混合)增加(SMD = 0.28,95%CI = 0.05-0.51,p = 0.02)。结论:与我们的假设相反,护理者抑郁症状改善时功能障碍的应对增加。初步证据表明,尽管仅以解决方案为重点的应对方式并没有增加,但积极的应对方式却增加了基于情感支持和接受的应对方式。需要更多的研究来阐明成功的干预措施是否可以通过立即和长期改变应对策略来发挥作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号