首页> 外文期刊>Journal of applied physiology >What makes long-term resistance-trained individuals so strong? A comparison of skeletal muscle morphology, architecture, and joint mechanics
【24h】

What makes long-term resistance-trained individuals so strong? A comparison of skeletal muscle morphology, architecture, and joint mechanics

机译:是什么让长期阻力训练有素的人如此强大? 骨骼肌形态,体系结构和联合力学的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The greater muscular strength of long-term resistance-trained (LTT) individuals is often attributed to hypertrophy. but the role of other factors, notably maximum voluntary specific tension (ST), muscle architecture, and any differences in joint mechanics (moment arm), have not been documented. The aim of the present study was to examine the musculoskeletal factors that might explain the greater quadriceps strength and size of LIT vs. untrained (UT) individuals. LIT (n = 16. age 21.6 +/- 2.0 yr) had 4.0 +/- 0.8 yr of systematic knee extensor heavy-resistance training experience, whereas UT (n = 52; age 25.1 +/- 2.3 yr) had no lower-body resistance training experience for >18 mo. Knee extension dynamometry, Ti-weighted magnetic resonance images of the thigh and knee, and ultrasonography of the quadriceps muscle group at 10 locations were used to determine quadriceps: isometric maximal voluntary torque (MVT). muscle volume (Q(VOL)), patella tendon moment arm (PTMA), pennation angle (Q(Theta P)) and fascicle length (QF(L)), physiological cross-sectional area (QPCSA), and ST. LTT had substantially greater MVT (+60% vs. UT, P < 0.001) and Q(VOL) (+56%, P < 0.001) and QPCSA (+41%, P < 0.001) but smaller differences in ST (+9%, P < 0.05) and moment arm (+4%, P < 0.05). and thus muscle size was the primary explanation for the greater strength of LTT. The greater muscle size (volume) of LIT was primarily attributable to the greater QPCSA (+41%; indicating more sarcomeres in parallel) rather than the more modest difference in F-L (+11%; indicating more sarcomeres in series). There was no evidence in the present study for regional hypertrophy after LTT.
机译:长期抗性训练(LTT)个体的更大肌肉强度通常归因于肥大。但是,尚未记录其他因素,特别是最大自愿特定张力(ST),肌肉建筑和联合力学(时刻手臂)的任何差异。本研究的目的是检查可能解释Lit与未经训练(UT)个人的更大Quadriceps强度和大小的肌肉骨骼因素。 LIT(n = 16岁21.6岁+/- 2.0岁)系统膝关节伸肌重型训练经验4.0 +/- 0.8岁,而UT(n = 52;年龄25.1 +/- 2.3 YR)没有较低28 Mo的车身抵抗训练经验。膝关节动力学,大腿和膝关节的Ti加权磁共振图像以及10个位置的Quadriceps肌肉组的超声检查用于确定Quadriceps:等距最大自愿扭矩(MVT)。肌肉体积(Q(Vol)),髌骨肌腱力矩臂(PTMA),缠绕角度(Q(Q(Q(Q(Q(QF(L)),生理横截面积(QPCSA)和ST。 LTT的MVT(+ 60%与UT,P <0.001)和Q(+ 56%,P <0.001)和QPCSA(+ 41%,P <0.001),但ST的差异较小(+9 %,P <0.05)和力矩臂(+ 4%,P <0.05)。因此,肌肉尺寸是LTT的更大强度的主要解释。 Lit的较大的肌肉尺寸(体积)主要是归因于更大的QPCSA(+ 41%;并行表示更多的SARCORES)而不是F-L(+ 11%的更温差)(+ 11%;指示串联的更多SARCOMERES)。目前没有证据表明LTT后的区域肥大研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号