首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Agricultural Education >Competition as an Instructional Approach in School-Based, Agricultural Education (SBAE): A Historical Review
【24h】

Competition as an Instructional Approach in School-Based, Agricultural Education (SBAE): A Historical Review

机译:竞争作为校本,农业教育(SBAE)的教学方法:历史审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this study was to examine and describe the historical role of competition as an instructional approach in SBAE. Pragmatism was found to be the philosophical underpinning of competition in SBAE, and the influences of William James and John Dewey were described. The growth of new National FFA contests was presaged by seminal legislative acts such as the Smith-Hughes Act of 1917, the Vocational Education Act of 1963, and by educational reforms in the 1980s. We also identified and discussed the challenges associated with using competition as an instructional approach. Based on the profession's longstanding concerns about competition at the expense of instruction, i.e., prizing winning over learning, it was recommended that SBAE's stakeholders continue to examine the educational merits of its competitive activities to revise, alleviate, or add such as may be needed.
机译:本研究的目的是检查和描述竞争作为SBAE中教学方法的历史作用。 发现实用主义是SBAE竞争的哲学支撑,并描述了威廉詹姆斯和约翰杜威的影响。 新国家FFA竞赛的增长是由1917年史密斯 - 休斯法案等史密斯 - 休斯法案,1963年职业教育法,以及20世纪80年代的教育改革。 我们还确定并讨论了与使用竞争相关的挑战作为教学方法。 根据专业的长期关注竞争的牺牲,即奖杯赢得学习,建议SBAE的利益相关者继续审查其竞争活动的教育精神,以修改,缓解或补充可能需要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号