...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery >Comparative pulmonary function and pharmacokinetics of fluticasone propionate and salmeterol xinafoate delivered by two dry powder inhalers to patients with asthma.
【24h】

Comparative pulmonary function and pharmacokinetics of fluticasone propionate and salmeterol xinafoate delivered by two dry powder inhalers to patients with asthma.

机译:两种干粉吸入器向哮喘患者施用氟替卡松丙酸酯和盐酸锡XinaFoate的比较肺功能和药代动力学。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: This report presents results of the first human study of a new dry powder inhaler (DPI-C). DPI-C uses reverse flow cyclone technology to retain larger particles in the device and to increase efficiency of respirable drug release. The study was conducted to determine comparative pharmacokinetics (not bioequivalence) of DPI-C and DPI-A (Advair Diskus(R), GlaxoSmithKline) and to establish preliminary efficacy and safety of DPI-C. METHODS: Nineteen patients with mild-moderate asthma received two treatments (randomized crossover design). Treatments were one inhalation from DPI-A labeled to deliver 100 mug fluticasone propionate and 50 mug salmeterol, or one inhalation from DPI-C which contained approximately 10% less of each drug per metered dose. Prior to dosing, 10 g of charcoal was administered. FEV1 increase over baseline (measured over 12 h), plasma concentrations of fluticasone and salmeterol (measured over 12.5 h), and occurrence of adverse events were the primary measures of device performance and safety. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were evaluable. Response profiles of percent increase in FEV1 over baseline showed no statistically significant differences between devices. Peak plasma concentrations of both fluticasone (p=0.003) and salmeterol (p=0.084) were higher from DPI-C. Mean extent of absorption [area under the curve (AUC)] of fluticasone was approximately 30% greater with DPI-C, whereas AUC of salmeterol was approximately 40% greater with DPI-A. CONCLUSIONS: DPI-C provided similar improvement in pulmonary function compared with DPI-A. Pharmacokinetic results showed a greater initial absorption of salmeterol with DPI-C but greater continued absorption and a 40% greater AUC with DPI-A, which we attribute to slower but more extensive oral absorption because of the greater mass of swallowed large particles of salmeterol generated by DPI-A. No patient reported any treatment-related adverse event or use of rescue medication during this study. Determination of the significance of the observed differences in pharmacokinetics from this single-dose study requires further exploration in studies using clinically relevant dosing regimens.
机译:背景:本报告显示了新的干粉吸入器(DPI-C)的第一次人类研究的结果。 DPI-C采用逆流旋风机技术在设备中保留较大的颗粒并提高可吸毒释放的效率。进行该研究以确定DPI-C和DPI-A(Advair Diskus(R),Glaxosmithkline)的比较药代动力学(不是生物等值),并建立DPI-C的初步疗效和安全性。方法:19例患有温和 - 中度哮喘的九个治疗方法(随机交叉设计)。从标记的DPI-A吸入处理以递送100杯氟基丙酸盐和50个甲甲酸锡,或者从DPI-C中吸入,每种计量剂量的每种药物的每种药物少约10%。在给药之前,施用10g木炭。 FEV1增加基线(测量超过12小时),血浆浓度的氟替卡松和萨尔米尔(测量超过12.5小时),并且不良事件的发生是器件性能和安全的主要措施。结果:17名患者是可评估的。基线FEV1增加百分比的响应概况显示,设备之间没有统计学上显着的差异。从DPI-C均高于DPI-C的泡升(P = 0.003)和Salmeterol(P = 0.084)的峰血浆浓度。用DPI-C,氟替卡松的荷兰松(AUC)曲线(AUC)下面积为大约30%,而DPI-A,Salmeterol的AUC约为40%。结论:与DPI-A相比,DPI-C提供了类似的肺功能提高。药代动力学结果表明,具有DPI-C的Salmeterol初始初始吸收,但具有更高的持续吸收和具有DPI-A的40%,我们归因于较慢但更广泛的口腔吸收,因为产生的吞噬大颗粒产生的吞咽大量颗粒。产生的大量唾液通过dpi-a。在本研究期间,没有患者报告任何治疗相关的不良事件或使用救援药物。从该单剂量研究中观察到的药代动力学差异的重要性需要在使用临床相关的剂量方案的研究中进一步探索。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号