首页> 外文期刊>Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery >In Vitro Tests for Aerosol Deposition. VI: Realistic Testing with Different Mouth-Throat Models and In VitroIn Vivo Correlations for a Dry Powder Inhaler, Metered Dose Inhaler, and Soft Mist Inhaler
【24h】

In Vitro Tests for Aerosol Deposition. VI: Realistic Testing with Different Mouth-Throat Models and In VitroIn Vivo Correlations for a Dry Powder Inhaler, Metered Dose Inhaler, and Soft Mist Inhaler

机译:用于气溶胶沉积的体外试验。 VI:用不同的嘴喉模型和干粉吸入器,计量剂量吸入器和软雾吸入器的耐血液体内相关性测试

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background:In vitroin vivo correlations (IVIVC) for lung deposition may be established by testing inhalers in vitro with realistic mouth-throat (MT) models and inhalation profiles (IP). This study was designed to compare the currently available MT models and their ability to predict in vivo lung deposition. Methods: Budelin((R)) Novolizer((R)), Ventolin((R)) Evohaler((R)), and Respimat((R)) fenoterol were chosen to represent a dry powder inhaler (DPI), metered dose inhaler (MDI), and soft mist inhaler (SMI) in tests using eight MT models: small, medium, and large Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) models; small, medium, and large oropharyngeal consortium (OPC) models, the medium adult Alberta Idealized Throat (AIT), and the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Induction Port, with IPs that simulated those used by volunteers in lung scintigraphy studies. Drug deposition in MT was compared across the models, and IVIVCs evaluated by comparing values for total lung dose in vitro (TLDin vitro) to those reported in the clinic. Results: MT deposition was dependent on both the flow condition and MT geometry for all the inhalers, while the deposition rank order was independent of both factors. The overall ranking was USP OPCL AIT VCUL VCUM OPCM VCUS OPCS. All model groups (VCU, OPC, AIT, and USP) produced TLDin vitro comparable with TLDin vivo for the DPI, where flow conditions dominated aerosol deposition. Only the VCU and OPC models produced good IVIVCs for the MDI, where MT geometry dominated deposition. In vitro tests with the SMI at 15-45L/min underestimated MT deposition and overestimated lung deposition with all MT models except OPCs, although testing at higher flow rates showed good agreement with in vivo results. Conclusions: While realistic in vitro tests may produce results that correspond to drug deposition in vivo, MT model selection was most important for the MDI and SMI, but much less important than inhalation strength for the DPI.
机译:背景:在体外相关(IVIVC)中,可以通过用现实的口喉(MT)模型和吸入型材(IP)在体外测试吸入器来建立肺沉积的相关性(IVIVC)。本研究旨在比较目前可用的MT模型及其预测体内肺部沉积的能力。方法:Budelin((R))NovoLizer((R)),ventolin((R))Evohaler((R))和Respimat((R)),不选择FENoterol代表干粉吸入器(DPI),计量剂量吸入器(MDI)和软雾吸入器(SMI)在测试中使用八MT型号:小,中等和大型弗吉尼亚英联邦大学(VCU)型号;小型,中型和大量的OPC)模型,中等成人艾伯塔省理想化的喉咙(AIT)和美国药典(USP)感应端口,具有模拟蠕动闪烁研究中志愿者使用的IPS的IPS。在模型中比较MT中的药物沉积,并且通过将体外(TLDIN体外)的总肺剂量值与临床报告的那些进行比较来评价的IVIVC。结果:MT沉积取决于所有吸入器的流动条件和MT几何形状,而沉积等级顺序与这两个因素无关。总排名为USP& opcl& vcul& vcum& vcum& vcum& vcum& vcum& vcum& vcum& vcum& vcum& vcum& vcum& vcum& vcum& vcum&所有模型组(VCU,OPC,AIT和USP)产生了与DPI的TLDIN体内相当的TLDIN体外,其中流动条件占据了气溶胶沉积。只有VCU和OPC模型为MDI制作了良好的IVIVC,其中MT几何标准占据沉积。用除OPCS以外的所有MT模型,在15-45L / min的体外测试以15-45L / min低估的MT沉积和高估肺部沉积,尽管以更高的流速测试表现出与体内结果的良好一致性。结论:虽然现实的体外试验可能产生对应于体内药物沉积的结果,但MT模型选择对于MDI和SMI最重要,但比DPI的吸入强度更重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号