首页> 外文期刊>Journal of abnormal child psychology >When Do those 'Risk-Taking Adolescents' Take Risks? The Combined Effects of Risk Encouragement by Peers, Mild-to-Borderline Intellectual Disability and Sex
【24h】

When Do those 'Risk-Taking Adolescents' Take Risks? The Combined Effects of Risk Encouragement by Peers, Mild-to-Borderline Intellectual Disability and Sex

机译:什么时候那些“冒着风险青少年”的风险? 对同龄人的风险鼓励的综合影响,轻度到边界智力残疾和性别

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Adolescents with mild to borderline intellectual disability (MBID) show more daily life risk taking than typically developing adolescents. To obtain insight in when these "risk-taking adolescents" especially take risks, we investigated main and interaction effects of (a) MBID, (b) sex, and (c) type of peer influence on risk taking. The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) was used as a proxy of real-life risk taking. 356 adolescents (12-19 years, 51.7% MBID, 63.4% boys) were randomly assigned to one of three BART peer-influence conditions: solo (no peers), positive risk encouragement (e.g., 'You are cool if you continue') or negative risk encouragement (e.g., 'You are a softy if you do not continue'). The main finding was that boys with MBID took more risks than typically developing boys in the negative risk encouragement condition. Boys with MBID also took more risks in the negative risk encouragement condition compared to the solo condition, whereas typically developing boys did not. There were no such effects for girls. Surprisingly, boys with MBID took less risks in the solo condition than typically developing boys. We conclude that boys with MBID especially show high risk taking when peers belittle or threat with exclusion from the peer group. Prevention and intervention programs should specifically target boys with MBID to teach them to resist negative risk encouragement by peers.
机译:青少年与濒临联系智力障碍(MBID)显示出多的日常生活风险,而不是典型的开发青少年。为了获得洞察,当这些“风险青少年”特别冒险时,我们调查了(a)mbid,(b)性别的主要和相互作用,(c)对同伴对风险的影响。气球模拟风险任务(BART)被用作现实风险的代理。 356名青少年(12-19岁,51.7%MBID,63.4%的男孩)被随机分配到三个巴特同伴影响条件之一:独奏(没有同龄人),正面风险鼓励(例如,如果你继续,你很酷)或负面风险鼓励(例如,'如果您不继续'),您是一个粗略的人。主要观点是,MBID的男孩比通常在负面风险鼓励条件下开发男孩的风险更多。与独资情况相比,MBID的男孩也在负面风险鼓励条件下采取了更多的风险,而典型的发展男孩则没有。女孩没有这样的效果。令人惊讶的是,有MBID的男孩在独奏条件下的风险较少,而不是典型的发展男孩。我们得出结论,当同龄人从同行组排除或威胁时,患有MBID的男孩特别展现出高风险。预防和干预计划应专门针对MBID的男孩来教导他们抵抗同行的负面风险鼓励。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号