Effectiveness and safety of switching from prostaglandin analog monotherapy to prostaglandin/timolol fixed combination therapy or adding ripasudil

摘要

Purpose To compare the effectiveness and safety of either switching from topical prostaglandin (PG) analog monotherapy to topical PG/timolol fixed combination therapy or adding topical ripasudil therapy. Study design An open-label, prospective, randomized, parallel group, comparative study Methods Fifty-one patients (51 eyes) with primary open-angle glaucoma who experienced insufficient intraocular pressure (IOP) control while taking a PG analog were enrolled. The participants were divided into the following treatment groups: PG/timolol fixed combination (switched group) or ripasudil therapy addition (added group). Blood pressure, IOP, and pulse rate were measured at baseline and after 1 and 3 months of study treatment. Adverse reactions and decreased effectiveness were examined. Results The mean IOP after 3 months of therapy was 14.3 ± 2.2 mmHg in the switched group and 14.7 ± 3.0 mmHg in the added group, both of which were significantly lower than those at baseline (switched, 16.3 ± 3.0 mmHg; added, 16.6 ± 2.8 mmHg; both P < .001). At 3 months, the IOP was reduced by 2.0 ± 1.7 mmHg (11.7 ± 9.6%) in the switched group and by 1.8 ± 2.1 mmHg (10.7 ± 12.5%) in the added group. In the added group, the diastolic blood pressure after 1 month of therapy was significantly lower than that at baseline ( P < .05). In the switched group, 10 (40.0%) and 2 (8.0%) participants experienced adverse reactions at 1 and 3 months, respectively. In the added group, 6 (23.1%) and 4 (15.4%) participants experienced adverse reactions at 1 and 3 months, respectively. Treatment was discontinued in 4 participants (16.0%) in the switched group and in 1 participant (3.8%) in the added group. Conclusion Treatment changes involving either switching from a PG analog to PG/timolol fixed combination eye drops or adding ripasudil to PG analog therapy were equally safe and effective in reducing IOP.