首页> 外文期刊>World Development >Augmenting the IAD framework to reveal power in collaborative governance - An illustrative application to resource industry dominated processes
【24h】

Augmenting the IAD framework to reveal power in collaborative governance - An illustrative application to resource industry dominated processes

机译:增强IAD框架以揭示协作治理的权力 - 资源行业主导流程的说明性应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Collaborative governance is often used as a strategy to address seemingly intractable common pool resource (CPR) problems. However, significant power imbalances can constrain the creation, adoption and implementation of socially and environmentally desirable policies. This study integrates theory on power with the institutional analysis and design (IAD) framework in order to provide a conceptual framework for examining power that is not captured through the IAD's focus on action situations. We examined the use of collaboration in CPR governance contexts characterized by significant power imbalances. Two Canadian collaborative processes that involve large energy industry interests were studied. We assessed the ability of these collaborative processes to address social and environmental goals. Results revealed significant hidden power dynamics related to inaction and non-decisions. Collaboration was unable to produce progressive outcomes because of i) the restriction of the collaborative agenda by powerful actors; ii) selective enforcement of rules; and; iii) a broader neoliberal context that inherently favoured increasing resource extraction. These findings indicate that the achievement of progressive social and environmental outcomes through collaboration is constrained where powerful resource industries are present as participants. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:协作治理通常被用作解决似乎棘手的公共池资源(CPR)问题的策略。然而,显着的权力失衡可以限制社会和环境所需政策的创造,采用和实施。本研究将权力与制度分析和设计(IAD)框架整合,以便为审查未通过IAD侧重于行动情况而捕获的权力的概念框架。我们审查了在CPR治理环境中使用协作的使用,其特征在于显着的功率不平衡。研究了涉及大能行业兴趣的加拿大协作过程。我们评估了这些协作流程解决社会和环境目标的能力。结果揭示了与无所作为和非决策有关的显着隐藏的力量动态。合作无法产生渐进结果,因为i)通过强大的行动者的合作议程的限制; ii)选择性执行规则;和; iii)一种更广泛的新自由主义背景,其本身倾向于增加资源提取。这些调查结果表明,通过合作实现逐步的社会和环境结果受到强大的资源行业作为参与者的影响。 (c)2018年elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号