首页> 外文期刊>Alzheimer’s & dementia: the journal of the Alzheimer’s Association >Suitability of the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes as a single primary endpoint for Alzheimer's disease trials
【24h】

Suitability of the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes as a single primary endpoint for Alzheimer's disease trials

机译:老年痴呆症框盒总和作为单个阿尔茨海默氏病试验主要终点的适用性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Clinical measures continue to be used as primary endpoints for disease-modifying trials for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Currently, two co-primary endpoints must be specified, which measure cognitive and functional impairments. Generally, the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) is one of the co-primary endpoints, but high variability in this measure results in large sample sizes. We evaluated the psychometric properties of the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) to assess its suitability as a single primary endpoint as an alternative to the traditional co-primary approach. Methods: Internal consistency, structural and convergent validity, and 2-year internal and external responsiveness of the CDR-SB were assessed in 667 very mild to moderate (global Clinical Dementia Rating, 0.5-2) AD patients from the REAL.FR (Réseau sur la Maladie d'Alzheimer Franais) study. Results: The CDR-SB showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.88), and acceptable structural (separate "cognitive" and "functional" factors) and convergent validity. Variability in mean changes over time was low, leading to excellent internal responsiveness (effect size = 1.2; standardized response mean = 1.17 at 2 years) and smaller sample sizes as compared with the ADAS-Cog. External responsiveness was acceptable when compared with "clinically meaningful" changes on the Activities of Daily Living scale but only borderline acceptable when compared with the ADAS-Cog and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living. Levels of missing data and floor/ceiling effects were low. Conclusions: The CDR-SB measures cognitive and functional impairment simultaneously, and has excellent 2-year internal responsiveness. This makes it a promising candidate as a sole primary endpoint for AD trials, although more work is required to determine the clinical relevance of CDR-SB changes, and its usefulness as an endpoint at other disease stages.
机译:背景:临床措施仍被用作阿尔茨海默氏病(AD)疾病缓解试验的主要终点。当前,必须指定两个共同主要终点,以衡量认知和功能障碍。通常,阿尔茨海默氏病疾病评估量表-认知子量表(ADAS-Cog)是共同主要终点之一,但该方法的高度可变性导致样本量大。我们评估了《临床痴呆症分类盒总和》(CDR-SB)的心理计量学特性,以评估其作为单一主要终点作为传统共同主要疗法的替代方法的适用性。方法:对来自REAL.FR(Réseau)的667名轻度至中度(全球临床痴呆评分为0.5-2)AD患者的CDR-SB的内部一致性,结构和收敛效度以及2年内部和外部响应进行了评估sur la Maladie d'Alzheimer Franais)研究。结果:CDR-SB显示出良好的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha = 0.88),并且具有可接受的结构性(“认知”和“功能”因子分开)和收敛效度。与ADAS-Cog相比,平均随时间变化的变异性较低,从而导致出色的内部响应度(效应量= 1.2; 2年时标准化响应平均值= 1.17)和较小的样本量。与“日常活动”量表的“临床意义”变化相比,外部反应是可以接受的,但与ADAS-Cog和日常工具活动相比,则只有边缘性可以接受。丢失数据和地板/天花板影响的水平很低。结论:CDR-SB可同时测量认知和功能障碍,并具有出色的2年内部反应能力。尽管需要更多的工作来确定CDR-SB变化的临床相关性及其在其他疾病阶段作为终点的有用性,但这使其成为有希望的候选药物作为AD试验的唯一主要终点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号