...
首页> 外文期刊>JACC. Cardiovascular interventions >Comparison of titanium-nitride-oxide-coated stents with zotarolimus-eluting stents for coronary revascularization a randomized controlled trial.
【24h】

Comparison of titanium-nitride-oxide-coated stents with zotarolimus-eluting stents for coronary revascularization a randomized controlled trial.

机译:碳糖氧化物支架与冠状动脉血管支撑氧化钛 - 氧化物支架的比较冠状动脉血管化冠状动脉血管化。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the efficacy of passive stent coating with titanium-nitride-oxide (TiNO) with drug-eluting stents releasing zotarolimus (ZES) (Endeavor, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota). BACKGROUND: Stent coating with TiNO has been shown to reduce restenosis compared with bare-metal stents in experimental and clinical studies. METHODS: In an assessor-blind noninferiority study, 302 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were randomized to treatment with TiNO or ZES. The primary endpoint was in-stent late loss at 6 to 8 months, and analysis was by intention to treat. RESULTS: Both groups were well balanced with respect to baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics. The TiNO group failed to reach the pre-specified noninferiority margin for the primary endpoint (in-stent late loss: 0.64 +/- 0.61 mm vs. 0.47 +/- 0.48 mm, difference: 0.16, upper 1-sided 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26; p(noninferiority) = 0.54), and subsequent superiority testing was in favor of ZES (p(superiority) = 0.02). In-segment binary restenosis was lower with ZES (11.1%) than with TiNO (20.5%; p(superiority) = 0.04). A stratified analysis of the primary endpoint found particularly pronounced differences between stents among diabetic versus nondiabetic patients (0.90 +/- 0.69 mm vs. 0.39 +/- 0.38 mm; p(interaction) = 0.04). Clinical outcomes showed a similar rate of death (0.7% vs. 0.7%; p = 1.00), myocardial infarction (5.3% vs. 6.7%; p = 0.60), and major adverse cardiac events (21.1% vs. 18.0%, hazard ratio: 1.19, 95% CI: 0.71 to 2.00; p = 0.50) at 1 year. There were no differences in rates of definite or probable stent thrombosis (0.7% vs. 0%; p = 0.51) at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with TiNO, ZES was superior with regard to late loss and binary restenosis. The concept of passive stent coating with TiNO remains inferior to drug-eluting stent technology in reducing restenosis. ([TIDE] Randomized Trial Comparing Titan Stent With Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent: NCT00492908).
机译:目的:本研究试图将被动支架涂层与氮化钛 - 氧化钛(Tino)的功效与释放Zotarolimus(ZES)(exceavor,Medtronic,Minneapolis,Minunsota)进行比较。背景:与实验和临床研究中的裸金属支架,有TINO的支架涂层已被证明可以减少再狭窄。方法:在评估逆下的非血小效性研究中,经过经皮冠状动脉干预的302名患者随机用TINO或ZES治疗。主要终点在6至8个月内持续的晚期损失,分析是意图治疗。结果:两组相对于基线临床和血管造影特征良好平衡。 TINO组未能达到主要终点的预先指定的非损失范围(支架晚期损失:0.64 +/- 0.61 mm,差异:0.16,上单边95%置信区间[CI]:0.26; p(非闭合性)= 0.54),随后的优势测试有利于ZES(P(优势)= 0.02)。分段二元再生率低于ZES(11.1%)而不是TIN(20.5%; P(优越性)= 0.04)。患有糖尿病患者的支架之间的初级终点的分层分析与非糖尿病患者(0.90 +/- 0.69 mm; p(相互作用)= 0.04)。临床结果显示出类似的死亡率(0.7%vs.0.7%; p = 1.00),心肌梗死(5.3%vs.6.7%; p = 0.60)和主要的不良心脏事件(21.1%与18.0%,危害比率:1.19,95%CI:0.71至2.00; p = 0.50)在1年。 1年内,明确或可能的支架血栓形成率没有差异(可能的支架血栓形成(0.7%vs.0%; p = 0.51)。结论:与TINO相比,ZES在晚期损失和二元再生方面是优越的。具有TINO的被动支架涂层的概念依赖于减少再狭窄的药物洗脱支架技术。 ([潮汐]随机试验与Zotarolimus洗脱支架的钛支架比较:NCT00492908)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号