...
首页> 外文期刊>Drug safety: An international journal of medical toxicology and drug experience >Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
【24h】

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

机译:心房颤动患者直接口服抗凝血剂的比较效果和安全性:对观察研究的系统综述与荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background There are no head-to-head randomized controlled trials comparing different direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Thus, we systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed observational studies assessing the comparative effectiveness and safety of DOACs for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods We systematically searched MEDLINE and EMBASE up to February 2019 for observational studies comparing different DOACs head-to-head in patients with AF. Two independent reviewers identified studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Random-effects models were used to meta-analyze data across higher-quality studies. Results We identified 25 cohort studies including 1,079,565 patients with AF treated with DOACs. Meta-analysis of the 19 studies at moderate risk of bias yielded a similar risk of ischemic stroke for rivaroxaban versus dabigatran (six studies; hazard ratio [HR] 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-1.04; I-2: 0%), apixaban versus dabigatran (five studies; HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.82-1.09; I-2: 0%), and apixaban versus rivaroxaban (four studies; HR 1.07; 95% CI 0.93-1.23; I-2: 0%). Regarding major bleeding, there was an increased risk for rivaroxaban versus dabigatran (six studies; HR 1.33; 95% CI 1.20-1.47; I-2: 22%) and decreased risks for apixaban versus either dabigatran (eight studies; HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.64-0.78; I-2: 0%) or rivaroxaban (eight studies; HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.48-0.65; I-2: 69%). Conclusions As head-to-head trials comparing different DOACs do not exist, available evidence derives exclusively from observational studies. These data suggest that while dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban have a similar effect on the risk of ischemic stroke, apixaban may be associated with a decreased risk of major bleeding compared with either dabigatran or rivaroxaban.
机译:背景技术没有针对不同直接口服抗凝血剂(Doacs)的头脑随机对照试验。因此,我们系统地审查和荟萃分析的观察研究,评估了心房颤动患者卒中预防的DOAC的比较有效性和安全性(AF)。方法我们系统地搜索了Medline和2019年2月的Medline和Embase,用于观察研究,比较AF的患者的不同Doacs头脑。两个独立的审阅者确定了研究,提取数据,并使用偏倚的偏差风险(Robins-i)工具的非随机性研究风险评估偏差风险。随机效应模型用于在更高质量的研究中进行分析数据。结果我们确定了25项队列研究,其中包括1,079,565名患者用DOAC治疗。对偏倚的中度风险的19项研究的META分析产生了类似缺血性卒中的缺血性卒中风险与达比甘(六项研究;危害比[HR] 0.93; 95%置信区间[CI] 0.83-1.04; I-2:0 %),Apixaban与Dabigatran(五项研究; HR 0.94; 95%CI 0.82-1.09; I-2:0%)和Apixaban与rivaroxaban(四项研究; HR 1.07; 95%CI 0.93-1.23; I-2: 0%)。关于重大出血,蓖麻昔扎兰的风险增加(六项研究; HR 1.33; 95%CI 1.20-1.47; I-2:22%),降低脂蛋白的风险与达比胍(八项研究; HR 0.71; 95 %CI 0.64-0.78; I-2:0%)或rivaroxaban(八项研究; HR 0.56; 95%CI 0.48-0.65; I-2:69%)。结论作为比较不同Doacs的头脑试验不存在,可用证据完全来自观察性研究。这些数据表明,虽然Dabigatran,Rivaroxaban和Apixaban对缺血性卒中风险产生类似的影响,但与Dabigatran或Rivaroxaban相比,Apixaban可能与重大出血的风险降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号