首页> 外文期刊>Digestive surgery >Evaluation of Anastomotic Leak after Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Typical Time Point of Occurrence, Mode of Diagnosis, Value of Routine Radiocontrast Agent Studies and Therapeutic Options
【24h】

Evaluation of Anastomotic Leak after Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Typical Time Point of Occurrence, Mode of Diagnosis, Value of Routine Radiocontrast Agent Studies and Therapeutic Options

机译:食管癌食管癌食管切除术后的吻合泄漏评价:典型的发生时间点,诊断模式,常规放射性试剂的价值和治疗选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: Data on the typical time point of occurrence of anastomotic leak (AL) after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer are currently scarce. Therefore, the usefulness of routine radiocontrast agent studies (RRCS) for testing proper healing of the anastomosis after esophagectomy remains unclear. Furthermore, preferred available tools to diagnose postoperative AL and therapeutic options are still under debate. Methods: We present a retrospective analysis of 328 consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer between 2005 and 2015. A RRCS has been performed to date in our center on the fifth postoperative day (POD), before returning to normal oral intake. Results: In total, 49 of 328 patients developed AL after esophagectomy (15%). A total of 11 patients (23%) developed AL before the RRCS and 34 patients (69%) after an unremarkable RRCS; and 4 patients (8%) with AL were diagnosed by RRCS, resulting in overall sensitivity of 16%. The median time point of occurrence of AL was POD 9, the majority of AL (84%) occurred between POD 1 and 19. Computed tomography led to the diagnosis of AL in 41%of patients. The most frequent therapy of AL was stenting in 47% of patients. Endoscopic vacuum therapy was used in 4 patients. Conclusions: The majority of AL occurred within the first 3 weeks after esophagectomy without a typical time point. In our series, RRCS on the fifth POD had a low sensitivity of 16%. Therefore, standardized RRCS and fasting till the examination cannot be generally recommended. In case of clinical suspicion of AL, computed tomography of the chest and abdomen with oral contrast agent should be performed, followed by endoscopy. Endoscopic stent placement remains the standard therapy of AL in our center. Endoscopic vacuum therapy evolves as it is an interesting alternative therapeutic option and can be combined with stenting in selected cases. (C) 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel
机译:背景:对食管癌食管癌食管切除术后吻合泄漏(Al)的典型时间点的数据目前是稀缺的。因此,在食管切除术后测试常规的辐射灭菌剂研究(RRC)用于检测吻合术治疗吻合术的有用性仍然尚不清楚。此外,诊断术后AL和治疗选择的首选可用工具仍在辩论下。方法:对2005年至2015年期间,对食管癌进行食管癌进行食管癌的328名连续患者进行了回顾性分析。在我们的第五天(POD)的中心,在恢复正常口服摄入前,迄今为止迄今为止进行了责任。结果:总共49例,328名患者在食管切除术后AL(15%)。在不起程度的RRCS之后,共有11名患者(23%)发达的Al和34名患者(69%); 4例患者(8%)通过RRC诊断,总体敏感性为16%。 Al的中值时间点是POD 9,POD 1和19之间的大多数Al(84%)发生。计算断层摄影导致41%的患者的Al诊断。 Al最常见的Al治疗在47%的患者中突破。 4例患者使用内窥镜真空疗法。结论:大多数Al在没有典型时间点后的前3周内发生。在我们的系列中,第五个POD上的RRC具有16%的敏感性。因此,标准化的RRC和禁食通常不推荐检查。在临床怀疑Al的情况下,应进行胸部和腹部具有口腔造影剂的胸部断层扫描,然后进行内窥镜检查。内窥镜支架放置仍然是我们中心的Al的标准治疗。内窥镜真空疗法随着一个有趣的替代治疗选择而发展,并且可以在选定病例中与支架组合。 (c)2017年S. Karger AG,巴塞尔

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号