...
首页> 外文期刊>Digestive Diseases and Sciences >Chronic hepatitis B management based on standard guidelines in community primary care and specialty clinics
【24h】

Chronic hepatitis B management based on standard guidelines in community primary care and specialty clinics

机译:基于社区初级保健和专业诊所的标准指南的慢性乙型肝炎管理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background and Aims: Prior studies have underlined the need for increased screening and awareness of chronic hepatitis B (CHB), especially in certain high-risk populations. However, few studies have examined the patterns of evaluation and management of CHB between primary care physicians (PCP) and specialists according to commonly-used professional guidelines. Our goal was to examine whether necessary laboratory parameters used to determine disease status and eligibility for antiviral therapy were performed by PCPs and specialists. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 253 treatment-na?ve CHB patients who were evaluated by PCP only (n = 63) or by specialists (n = 190) for CHB at a community multispecialty medical center between March 2007 and June 2009. Criteria for CHB management and treatment eligibility were based on the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases 2007 guideline and the US Panel 2006 algorithm. Required parameters for optimal evaluation for CHB included hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), HBV DNA, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT). Preferred antiviral agents for CHB included pegylated interferon, adefovir, and entecavir. Results: The majority of patients were Asians (90 %) and male (54 %) with a mean age of 43 ± 11.6 years. Compared to PCPs, specialists were more likely to order laboratory testing for ALT (94 vs. 86 %, P = 0.05), HBeAg (67 vs. 41 %, P < 0.0001) and HBV DNA (83 vs. 52 %, P < 0.0001). The proportion of patients having all three laboratory parameters was significantly higher among those evaluated by specialists compared to PCP (62 vs. 33 %, P < 0.0001). A total of 55 patients were initiated on antiviral treatment (n = 47 by specialists and n = 6 by PCPs). Lamivudine was prescribed more often by PCPs than specialists (33 vs. 2 %, P = 0.05). Preferred agents were used 96 % of the time by specialists compared to 67 % of those treated by PCPs (P = 0.05). Conclusion: Patients evaluated by specialists for CHB are more likely to undergo more complete laboratory evaluation and, if eligible, are also more likely to be treated with preferred longer-term agents for CHB compared to those evaluated by PCPs only. A collaborative model of care involving both PCP and specialists may further optimize management of patients with CHB.
机译:背景和目的:先前的研究强调了需要增加慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)的筛查和意识,特别是在某些高危人群中。然而,根据常用的专业指南,很少有研究审查了初级保健医生(PCP)和专家之间的CHB的评估和管理模式。我们的目标是检查用于确定疾病状况和抗病毒治疗的必要实验室参数是否由PCP和专家进行。方法:对2007年3月至2009年3月至2009年3月,在2007年3月至2009年3月间在社区Multipecialty Medical Center的CHB评估的253例治疗-NA ve患者的回顾性研究。 CHB管理和治疗资格的标准是基于美国肝病2007年肝病的研究协会和2006年2006年算法。对于CHB的最佳评估所需参数包括乙型肝炎E抗原(HBEAG),HBV DNA和丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)。用于CHB的优选的抗病毒剂包括聚乙二醇化干扰素,Adefovir和Entecavir。结果:大多数患者是亚洲人(90%)和男性(54%),平均年龄为43±11.6岁。与PCP相比,专家更有可能订购ALT的实验室检测(94 vs.86%,p = 0.05),HBeAg(67 vs.41%,P <0.0001)和HBV DNA(83对52%,P < 0.0001)。与PCP相比,通过专家评估的所有三种实验室参数的患者的比例显着更高(62 vs.33%,P <0.0001)。在抗病毒治疗中共启动了55例患者(通过专家N = 47和PCP = 6)。拉米夫定比专家更常见的是PCP(33 Vs.2%,P = 0.05)。使用优选的药剂通过专家为96%的时间,而PCP处理的67%(P = 0.05)。结论:CHB专家评估的患者更容易接受更完整的实验室评估,如果符合条件,也可能与仅由PCP评估的那些对CHB进行优选的长期试剂治疗。涉及PCP和专家涉及涉及PCP和专家的协作模型可能进一步优化CHB患者的管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号