...
首页> 外文期刊>Diseases of the Colon and Rectum >Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Versus Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery
【24h】

Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Versus Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery

机译:随机临床试验比较腹腔镜与超声引导的横向腹腹板在微创结直肠外科手术中的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Transversus abdominis plane block ma improve analgesia after colorectal surgery; however, techniques remain unstandardized and results are conflicting. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare laparoscopic and ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block with no block in minimally invasive colorectal surgery. DESIGN: This was a randomized controlled trial. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at an urban teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery were included. INTERVENTIONS: The intervention included 2:2:1 randomization to laparoscopic, ultrasound-guided, or no transversus abdominis plane block. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Morphine use in the first 24 hours after surgery was measured. RESULTS: The study cohort included 107 patients randomly assigned to laparoscopic (n = 41), ultrasound guided (n = 45), or no transversus abdominis plane block (n = 21). Mean age was 50.4 years (SD 18 y), and 50 patients (47%) were men. Laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block was superior to ultrasound-guided (p = 0.007) and no transversus abdominis plane block (p = 0.007), with median (interquartile range) total morphine used in the first 24 hours postoperatively of 17.6 nig (6.6-33.9 mg), 34.0 nig (16.4 44.4 mg), and 31.6 mg (18.4-44.4 mg). At 48 hours, laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block remained superior to ultrasound-guided (p = 0.03) and no transversus abdominis plane block (p = 0.007) with median (interquartile range) total morphine used at 48 hours postoperatively of 26.8 mg (15.5-45.8 mg), 44.0 mg (27.670.0 mg), and 60.8 mg (34.8-78.8 mg). Mean hospital stay was 5.1 3.1 days without any intergroup differences. Overall complications were similar between groups. LIMITATIONS: Treatment teams were not blinded and there was operator dependence of techniques and variable timing of the blocks. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block is superior to ultrasound-guided and no transversus abdominis plane block in achieving pain control and minimizing opioid use in the first 24 hours after colorectal surgery. A large, multicenter, randomized trial is needed to confirm our findings.
机译:背景:横向腹部平面块MA改善结直肠手术后的镇痛;然而,技术仍然崩溃,结果是矛盾的。目的:本研究的目的是比较腹腔镜和超声引导的横向腹部平面块,在微创结直肠手术中没有块。设计:这是一个随机对照试验。设置:该研究在城市教学医院进行。患者:包括接受腹腔镜结直肠手术的患者。干预措施:介入包括2:2:1对腹腔镜,超声引导或没有横向腹部平面块的随机化。主要观察指标:测量手术后的前24小时吗啡使用。结果:研究队列包括107名患者随机分配到腹腔镜(n = 41),超声引导(n = 45),或没有横向腹部平面块(n = 21)。平均年龄为50.4岁(SD 18 y),50名患者(47%)是男性。腹腔镜越v腹腹斜面块优于超声引导(p = 0.007),没有横向腹部平面块(p = 0.007),中位数(狭窄的范围)在术后24小时的前24小时内使用的总体吗啡(6.6-33.9 Mg),34.0 nig(16.444.4mg)和31.6mg(18.4-44.4mg)。在48小时内,腹腔镜横梁腹部平面块仍然优于超声引导(p = 0.03),并且在术后48小时的48小时内使用中值(四分位数范围)总体孔(p = 0.007),术后26.8mg(15.5- 45.8mg),44.0mg(27.670.0mg)和60.8mg(34.8-78.8mg)。平均住院入住时间为5.1 3.1天,没有任何互动差异。组之间的整体并发症相似。局限性:治疗团队没有蒙上蒙蔽,并且有经营者的技术依赖性和块的可变定时。结论:腹腔镜横梁腹部平面块优于超声引导,无横向腹部平面块在结肠直肠手术后的前24小时内实现疼痛控制和最小化阿片类药物。需要一个大型多中心的随机试验来确认我们的研究结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号