...
首页> 外文期刊>Disability and rehabilitation. >Post-stroke self-management interventions: a systematic review of effectiveness and investigation of the inclusion of stroke survivors with aphasia
【24h】

Post-stroke self-management interventions: a systematic review of effectiveness and investigation of the inclusion of stroke survivors with aphasia

机译:后冲程后自我管理干预:对含有失语症夹克幸存者的效果和调查的系统审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose: To systematically review self-management interventions to determine their efficacy for people with stroke in relation to any health outcome and to establish whether stroke survivors with aphasia were included. Method: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, and IBSS and undertook gray literature searches. Randomized controlled trials were eligible if they included stroke survivors aged 18 + in a "self-management" intervention. Data were extracted by two independent researchers and included an assessment of methodological quality. Results: 24 studies were identified. 11 out of 24 reported statistically significant benefits in favor of selfmanagement. However, there were significant limitations in terms of methodological quality, and metaanalyses (n— 8 studies) showed no statistically significant benefit of self-management upon global disability and stroke-specific quality of life at 3 months or ADL at 3 or 6 months follow-up. A review of inclusion and exclusion criteria showed 11 out of 24 (46%) studies reported total or partial exclusion of stroke survivors with aphasia. Four out of 24 (17%) reported the number of stroke survivors with aphasia included. In nine studies (38%) it was unclear whether stroke survivors with aphasia were included or excluded. Conclusions: Robust conclusions regarding the effectiveness of poststroke self-management approaches could not be drawn. Further trials are needed, these should clearly report the population included
机译:目的:系统地审查自我管理干预,以确定其与任何健康结果相关的人的疗效,并建立是否包括失语症中风幸存者。方法:我们搜索了Medline,Embase,Psycinfo,Cinahl,Cochrane图书馆和IBSS,并进行了灰色文学搜索。如果他们在“自我管理”干预中包括18岁的中风幸存者,随机对照试验符合条件。数据由两个独立的研究人员提取,包括对方法质量的评估。结果:确定了24项研究。 11分中的11个报告了有利于自我管理的统计上显着的益处。然而,在方法论质量方面存在显着的局限性,并且在3个月或3个月或3个月的3个月或ADL之间表现出在全球残疾和卒中特异性生活质量上的自我管理没有统计学显着的益处-向上。纳入和排除标准的审查显示了24例(46%)的研究报告了患有失语症的中风幸存者的总体或部分排除。 24个(17%)中的四个(17%)报告了包含失语症的中风幸存者的数量。在九项研究(38%)目前尚不清楚包含失语症的中风幸存者是否被列入或排除。结论:无法绘制关于超局自我管理方法的有效性的强大结论。需要进一步的试验,这些应该明确报告包括的人口

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号