...
首页> 外文期刊>Disability and rehabilitation. >The uses of outcome measures within multidisciplinary early childhood intervention services: a systematic review
【24h】

The uses of outcome measures within multidisciplinary early childhood intervention services: a systematic review

机译:多学科早期儿童干预服务中的结果措施的用途:系统审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose of the article: To review the use of outcome measures, across the domains of activity, participation, and environment, within multidisciplinary early childhood intervention services. Materials and methods: A systematic literature search was undertaken that included four electronic databases: Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library and Cochrane Database of Systematic Review. Inclusion criteria were age 0-24 months, having or at risk of a developmental disability, in receipt of multidisciplinary early childhood intervention services, and included outcome measures across all domains of the International Classification of Functioning-Child & Youth (ICF-CY). Only peer-reviewed journal articles were considered. Eligible studies were coded using the Oxford Levels of Evidence. Methodological quality was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) Scale for randomised controlled trials and the QualSyst for non-randomised control trials. Results: Of the total of 5764 records identified, 10 were considered to meet inclusion criteria. Conclusion: Fourteen outcome measures were identified, addressing the domains of activity, participation, and environment. Of these, eight have been recommended in the early intervention literature. While the methodological quality of the 10 studies varied, these papers make a contribution to the body of research that acknowledges the role of routine and enriched environments
机译:文章的目的:审查在多学科早期儿童干预服务中,在活动域名,参与和环境领域的使用情况来审查使用结果措施。材料和方法:进行系统文献搜索,包括四个电子数据库:Medline,Cinahl,Embase和Cochrane图书馆和系统审查的Cochrane数据库。纳入标准年龄0-24个月,在收到多学科早期儿童干预服务时具有或有风险发展残疾的风险,并在各个运作儿童和青年(ICF-CY)中的所有域名的结果措施。只考虑了同行评审的日记文章。使用牛津的证据进行编码合格的研究。使用物理疗法证据数据库(PEDRO)规模评估方法的方法质量,用于随机对照试验和非随机控制试验的Qualsyst。结果:确定的5764条记录,被认为是符合纳入标准。结论:确定了十四个结果措施,解决了活动,参与和环境领域。其中,在早期干预文献中推荐了八个。虽然10项研究的方法论质量不同,但这些论文对研究的作用作出了贡献,确认常规和丰富的环境的作用

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号