首页> 外文期刊>Diagnostic cytopathology >Prospective comparison of cytological specimen adequacy assessment by different rapid staining techniques for rapid on-site evaluation in fine needle aspiration cytology and their cost-effectiveness
【24h】

Prospective comparison of cytological specimen adequacy assessment by different rapid staining techniques for rapid on-site evaluation in fine needle aspiration cytology and their cost-effectiveness

机译:不同快速染色技术在微针假染细胞学中快速现场评价的细胞学样本充足评估的前瞻性比较及其成本效益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

ObjectiveRapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) is a technique beneficial in determining the adequacy of the samples, thereby increasing the diagnostic yield, useful in triage of specimens for ancillary studies and can also help determine a preliminary diagnosis in emergency cases. The different rapid stains for on-site evaluation described in the literature are diff quik, toluidine blue (TB), brilliant cresyl blue (BCB), ultra-fast Pap stains, and rapid hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). This study was undertaken as there is sparse literature regarding the best and the most cost-effective rapid stain.
机译:ObjectiveRapID现场评估(玫瑰)是一种有益于确定样品的充分性的技术,从而增加了辅助研究的标本的诊断产量,并且还可以帮助确定应急情况下的初步诊断。 文献中描述的现场评价的不同快速污渍是Diff中,甲苯胺蓝(TB),辉煌番茄蓝(BCB),超快速粉刺污渍和快速血清杂环蛋白和曙红(H&E)。 在稀疏的文献中进行了关于最佳和最具成本效益的快速染色的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号