首页> 外文期刊>Hypertension: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >Ambulatory Pulse Wave Velocity Is a Stronger Predictor of Cardiovascular Events and All-Cause Mortality Than Office and Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Hemodialysis Patients
【24h】

Ambulatory Pulse Wave Velocity Is a Stronger Predictor of Cardiovascular Events and All-Cause Mortality Than Office and Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Hemodialysis Patients

机译:动态脉搏波速度是心血管事件的更强的预测因子,而血液透析患者的办公室和动态血压则均导致死亡率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Arterial stiffness and augmentation of aortic blood pressure (BP) measured in office are known cardiovascular risk factors in hemodialysis patients. This study examines the prognostic significance of ambulatory brachial BP, central BP, pulse wave velocity (PWV), and heart rate-adjusted augmentation index [AIx(75)] in this population. A total of 170 hemodialysis patients underwent 48-hour ambulatory monitoring with Mobil-O-Graph-NG during a standard interdialytic interval and followed-up for 28.1 +/- 11.2 months. The primary end point was a combination of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke. Secondary end points included: (1) all-cause mortality; (2) cardiovascular mortality; and (3) a combination of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, resuscitation after cardiac arrest, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for heart failure. During follow-up, 37(21.8%) patients died and 46(27.1%) had cardiovascular events. Cumulative freedom from primary end point was similar for quartiles of predialysis-systolic BP (SBP), 48-hour peripheral-SBP, and central-SBP, but was progressively longer for increasing quartiles for 48-hour peripheral-diastolic BP and central-diastolic BP and shorter for increasing quartiles of 48-hour central pulse pressure (83.7%, 71.4%, 69.0%, 62.8% [log-rank P=0.024]), PWV (93.0%, 81.0%, 57.1%, 55.8% [log-rank P< 0.001]), and AIx(75) (88.4%, 66.7%, 69.0%, 62.8% [log-rank P=0.014]). The hazard ratios for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and the combined outcome were similar for quartiles of predialysis-SBP, 48-hour peripheral-SBP, and central-SBP, but were increasing with higher ambulatory PWV and AIx(75). In multivariate analysis, 48-hour PWV was the only vascular parameter independently associated with the primary end point (hazard ratios, 1.579; 95% confidence intervals, 1.187-2.102). Ambulatory PWV, AIx(75), and central pulse pressure are associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events and mortality, whereas office and ambulatory SBP are not. These findings further support that arterial stiffness is the prominent cardiovascular risk factor in hemodialysis.
机译:在办公室中测量的主动脉血压(BP)的动脉僵硬和增强是血液透析患者的已知心血管危险因素。本研究探讨了对该群体中的动态臂BP,中央BP,脉搏波速度(PWV)和心率调整的增强指数[AIX(75)]的预后意义。共有170例血液透析患者患有48小时的动态监测,Mobil-O-Graph-Ng在标准的跨亚胺间间隔期间,随访28.1 +/- 11.2个月。主要终点是全因死亡,非常见心肌梗死和非缺乏中风的组合。次要终点包括:(1)全导致死亡率; (2)心血管死亡率; (3)心血管死亡,非缺乏心肌梗死,非缺乏中风,复苏后心脏骤停,冠状动脉血运重建或住院治疗心力衰竭。在随访期间,37名(21.8%)患者死亡,46例(27.1%)有心血管事件。来自初级终点的累积自由度类似于预析性 - 收缩性BP(SBP),48小时外周-SBP和中央SBP的四分位数,但对于48小时外周 - 舒张性BP和中央舒张性的四分位数逐渐更长BP和较短的四分位数为48小时的中央脉冲压力(83.7%,71.4%,69.0%,62.8%[log-ange p = 0.024]),PWV(93.0%,81.0%,57.1%,55.8%[日志-Rank P <0.001])和AIX(75)(88.4%,66.7%,69.0%,62.8%[Log-Rank P = 0.014])。所有因果死亡率,心血管死亡率和组合结果的危险比例类似于预亚雷斯-SBP,48小时外周-SBP和中央SBP的四分位数,但随着高速公路PWV和AIX(75)的增加。在多变量分析中,48小时PWV是独立与主要终点(危险比,1.579; 95%置信区间,1.187-2.102)独立相关的血管参数。 Absomatory PWV,AIX(75)和中央脉冲压力与心血管事件和死亡率的风险增加有关,而Office和Abanculatory SBP则不是。这些发现进一步支持动脉僵硬是血液透析中突出的心血管危险因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号