首页> 外文期刊>Human brain mapping >At the core of reasoning: Dissociating deductive and non‐deductive load
【24h】

At the core of reasoning: Dissociating deductive and non‐deductive load

机译:在推理核心:解离演绎和非演绎负荷

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Abstract In recent years, neuroimaging methods have been used to investigate how the human mind carries out deductive reasoning. According to some, the neural substrate of language is integral to deductive reasoning. According to others, deductive reasoning is supported by a language‐independent distributed network including left frontopolar and frontomedial cortices. However, it has been suggested that activity in these frontal regions might instead reflect non‐deductive factors such as working memory load and general cognitive difficulty. To address this issue, 20 healthy volunteers participated in an fMRI experiment in which they evaluated matched simple and complex deductive and non‐deductive arguments in a 2?×?2 design. The contrast of complex versus simple deductive trials resulted in a pattern of activation closely matching previous work, including frontopolar and frontomedial “core” areas of deduction as well as other “cognitive support” areas in frontoparietal cortices. Conversely, the contrast of complex and simple non‐deductive trials resulted in a pattern of activation that does not include any of the aforementioned “core” areas. Direct comparison of the load effect across deductive and non‐deductive trials further supports the view that activity in the regions previously interpreted as “core” to deductive reasoning cannot merely reflect non‐deductive load, but instead might reflect processes specific to the deductive calculus. Finally, consistent with previous reports, the classical language areas in left inferior frontal gyrus and posterior temporal cortex do not appear to participate in deductive inference beyond their role in encoding stimuli presented in linguistic format.
机译:摘要近年来,神经影像学方法已被用来调查人类思维如何进行演绎推理。根据一些,语言的神经衬底是不能降低推理的不可或缺的。根据他人的说法,由左前波利多和题目皮质包括左前波动和艺术的分布式网络,支持演绎推理。然而,已经建议这些正面区域的活动可以反映非演绎因素,例如工作记忆载荷和一般认知难度。为了解决这个问题,20名健康的志愿者参加了一个FMRI实验,他们评估了2?×2设计中的简单和复杂的演绎和非演绎争论。复杂与简单演绎试验的对比产生了激活的模式,与前一项工作紧密匹配,包括前迁徙的铸模和题目“核心”区域以及前迁移的其他“认知支持”区域。相反,复杂和简单的非演绎试验的对比产生的激活模式,不包括上述“核心”区域中的任何一种。在演绎和非演绎试验中的负荷效应的直接比较进一步支持了以前解释为“核心”的地区的活动不能仅仅反映非演绎负荷,而是反映特定于演绎微积分的过程。最后,与先前的报告一致,左下额外转象和后颞皮质中的经典语言区域似乎没有参与推断超出其在语言形式中呈现的刺激中的作用之外的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号