...
首页> 外文期刊>Trends in Ecology & Evolution >Catheter-directed foam sclerotherapy with tumescence of the great saphenous vein versus ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy: A randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Catheter-directed foam sclerotherapy with tumescence of the great saphenous vein versus ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy: A randomized controlled trial

机译:导管导向泡沫硬化疗法巨大脊髓静脉与超声引导泡沫硬化治疗:随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives To compare the effectiveness of two foam sclerotherapy techniques of the great saphenous vein. Methods Fifty subjects with varicose veins, edema, and great saphenous vein incompetence (diameter 6-10 mm) were randomly categorized into two equal groups and were treated with different foam sclerotherapy techniques: A (usual ultrasound-guided) and B (catheter-directed with tumescence). Concomitant phlebectomy was performed in all patients. Patients were seen on days 7 and 28, and at six and 12 months. The primary outcomes were the full success rate of the treated great saphenous vein and the number of patients who required retreatment sessions performed at 28-day follow-up. The secondary-assisted outcomes were the full success rates of the treated great saphenous vein after the retreatment sessions at six- and 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were changes in quality of life and side effects and complications of the intervention. In case of reflux, retreatment sessions were performed at 28 days and six months in both groups. Results Full success rate of the treated great saphenous vein was 36% in group A vs. 80% in group B (p = 0.012) and the number of patients who required retreatment sessions were n = 14 in group A vs. n = 3 in group B at 28-day follow-up (p = 0.002). Both were statistically significant. At six and 12 months, the success rates were not statistically significant between the groups. Complication rates were similar between the groups. Quality of life improved in both groups with statistical difference (p < 0.001). Conclusions Catheter-directed foam sclerotherapy with tumescence was better than usual ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy as it reached higher full success rate of the treated great saphenous vein and as a lower number of patients required retreatment sessions in the short-term. Both methods proved to be safe and improved the quality of life.
机译:目标可以比较巨大隐含静脉两种泡沫硬化技术的有效性。方法对静脉曲张,水肿和大隐静脉无能(直径6-10mm)的50个受试者随机分为两组,并用不同的泡沫硬化技术治疗:(通常的超声引导)和B(导管导向)肿瘤)。伴随痰渗术在所有患者中进行。患者在第7天和第28天,六月和十二个月内看到。主要结果是治疗的巨大隐静脉的全部成功率和需要在28天的后续行动中进行撤退会议的患者数量。二次辅助结果是在六个月和12个月的后续行动后的撤退课程后经过治疗的巨大隐静脉的全部成功率。二次结果是生活质量和副作用的变化和干预的并发症。在回流的情况下,在两组均为28天和六个月进行后退会话。结果对经过治疗的巨大隐含静脉的全部成功率为A组血压率为36%(P = 0.012)和所需再处理会话的患者的数量在A组中的N = 14 B组在28天进行(P = 0.002)。两者都在统计学意义。在六到12个月,团体之间的成功率没有统计学意义。在组之间并发症率相似。两组的生活质量改善了统计学差异(P <0.001)。结论导管导向泡沫硬化疗法与膨胀优于通常的超声引导泡沫硬化疗法,因为它达到了经过治疗的巨大隐喻静脉的全部成功率,并且作为短期内需要挽救患者的较少数量的患者。两种方法都证明是安全的,提高了生活质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号