【24h】

Disparities in imaging utilization for acute ischemic stroke based on patient insurance status

机译:基于患者保险状况的急性缺血性卒中的影像学利用差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE. Previous studies have shown socioeconomic disparities in imaging utilization for both acute and chronic diseases. We studied a nationwide database to determine whether insurance-based disparities exist in the utilization of imaging for acute ischemic stroke. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Inpatients with a primary diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke from November 2005 through December 2011 were identified from the Perspective database. Patients were stratified into four groups according to insurance status as follows: uninsured, Medicaid, Medicare, and private insurance. Utilization rates of head CT, perfusion CT, head MRI, noninvasive head angiography (including head CT angiography [CTA] and head MR angiography [MRA]), noninvasive neck angiography (including neck CTA and neck MRA), carotid ultrasound, and echocardiography were compared using a chi-square test. A multivariable logistic regression model adjusting for potential confounding variables was fit to determine the association between insurance status and imaging utilization. RESULTS. A total of 210,212 patients were included in this study: 10,396 patients (5.0%) were uninsured, 14,243 patients (6.8%) had Medicaid, 153,209 patients (72.9%) had Medicare, and 32,364 patients (15.4%) had private insurance. Even after we had controlled for confounding variables, significant disparities existed in imaging utilization. Compared with patients with private insurance, uninsured patients had significantly lower odds of noninvasive head angiography (odds ratio [OR] = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.74-0.81, p < 0.0001), neck angiography (OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.76-0.83, p < 0.0001), and head MRI (OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.74-0.81, p < 0.0001). The same was true for Medicaid and Medicare patients. CONCLUSION. Disparities exist in the utilization of noninvasive head and neck imaging, MRI, and echocardiography for patients with acute ischemic stroke based on patient insurance status. More research is needed to understand these disparities.
机译:目的。先前的研究表明,急性和慢性疾病在影像利用上的社会经济差异。我们研究了一个全国数据库,以确定在急性缺血性卒中的影像学利用中是否存在基于保险的差异。材料和方法。从Perspective数据库中识别出2005年11月至2011年12月主要诊断为急性缺血性中风的住院患者。根据保险状况将患者分为四类:未投保,医疗补助,医疗保险和私人保险。头颅CT,灌注CT,头颅MRI,无创性头颅血管造影术(包括头颅CT血管造影术[CTA]和头颅MR血管造影术[MRA]),无创性颈部血管造影术(包括颈部CTA和颈部MRA),颈动脉超声和超声心动图的使用率分别为使用卡方检验进行比较。调整潜在混杂因素的多变量逻辑回归模型适合确定保险状况与影像利用之间的关联。结果。本研究共纳入210,212名患者:10,396例患者(5.0%)未投保,14,243例患者(6.8%)接受了医疗补助,153,209例患者(72.9%)享受了医疗保险,32,364例患者(15.4%)享受了私人保险。即使在我们控制了混杂变量之后,成像利用率仍然存在显着差异。与有私人保险的患者相比,未投保患者的无创性头部血管造影(几率[OR] = 0.78,95%CI = 0.74-0.81,p <0.0001),颈部血管造影(OR = 0.79,95%CI = 0.76-0.83,p <0.0001)和头部MRI(OR = 0.77,95%CI = 0.74-0.81,p <0.0001)。对于Medicaid和Medicare患者也是如此。结论。根据患者保险状况,在急性缺血性卒中患者使用无创头颈成像,MRI和超声心动图检查方面存在差异。需要更多的研究来理解这些差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号