...
首页> 外文期刊>Trends in Ecology & Evolution >Diverting loop ileostomy with colonic lavage as an alternative to colectomy for fulminant Clostridioides difficile: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Diverting loop ileostomy with colonic lavage as an alternative to colectomy for fulminant Clostridioides difficile: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:用结肠灌洗转移回路对血管造口术作为膨胀梭菌性艰难偶联的联合膜结肠切除术的替代方法:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose Surgical consultation is recommended for all patients with fulminant Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). If surgery is required, total abdominal colectomy (TAC) is most commonly performed. However, diverting loop ileostomy and colonic lavage have been recently developed as a potential colon-sparing approach to fulminant CDI. The aim of this review is to compare TAC and diverting loop ileostomy with colonic lavage for fulminant CDI. Methods Search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and PubMed was performed. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they compared TAC and diverting loop ileostomy with colonic lavage. The primary outcome was postoperative mortality, and the secondary outcome was postoperative complications. Quality of included studies was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results From 64 relevant citations, 5 studies (4 retrospective cohorts, 1 case series) with 3683 patients were included. Compared to TAC, diverting loop ileostomy with colonic lavage did not significantly reduce overall mortality (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.99, P = 0.77), rate of reoperation (RR 1.02, 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.63, P = 0.94), or overall postoperative complications (RR 0.51, 95% CI, 0.22 to 1.17, P = 0.11). Rates of colonic preservation with the use of diverting loop ileostomy with colonic lavage ranged from 76% to 100%. Conclusion There does not appear to be a survival advantage with the use of diverting loop ileostomy with colonic lavage compared to TAC for fulminant CDI. However, diverting loop ileostomy with colonic lavage results in increased rates of colonic preservation, restoration of intestinal continuity, and laparoscopic surgery. This review is limited by the small number of included studies.
机译:推荐目的外科咨询,适用于所有膨胀梭菌偶氮感染(CDI)的所有患者。如果需要手术,则最常进行腹上切除术(TAC)。然而,最近已经开发了转移回路对血管术和结肠灌洗作为激发CDI的潜在结肠备件方法。本综述的目的是将TAC和转移环路对血管灌洗进行转移的环素对漏洞灌洗。方法搜索Medline,Embase,Central和Pubmed。如果他们将TAC和转移环路对血管造口术进行比较和转移结肠灌洗,文章有资格包含。主要结果是术后死亡率,二次结果是术后并发症。使用纽卡斯尔 - 渥太华规模评估包括研究的质量。 64个相关引用的结果,包括3683名患者的5项研究(4个回顾性队列,1例案例系列)。与TAC相比,具有结肠灌洗的转移环对鼠瘘并没有显着降低总体死亡率(RR 1.10,95%CI 0.60至1.99,P = 0.77),再生率(RR 1.02,95%CI,0.63至1.63,P = 0.94 )或整体术后并发症(RR 0.51,95%CI,0.22至1.17,P = 0.11)。结肠保存的率利用转移回转环对灌洗液的环路术等于76%至100%。结论与结肠灌洗使用转移回合环路术,似乎没有似乎存在生存优势。然而,转移与结肠灌洗的环路对浮术术导致结肠保存,肠道连续性恢复和腹腔镜手术的增加。本综述受少数内容研究的限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号