【24h】

Femoroacetabular impingement: can the alpha angle be estimated?

机译:髋臼髋臼撞击:能否估计α角?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Femoroacetabular impingement is an important entity with well-described radiographic findings. One of the criteria of the cam type of femoroacetabular impingement is femoral head-neck dysplasia, denoted mathematically as the "alpha angle." Several observers have reported that direct measurement of the angle may not be necessary because subjective appraisal may yield similar results. We sought to scientifically determine the accuracy of a subjective assessment, using the calculated angle as the gold standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: At 1.5 T, 50 consecutive patients' hips were evaluated on sets of oblique axial images. Two musculoskeletal radiologists recorded their subjective opinion as to the alpha angle using a confidence scale of 1-5. Direct mathematic measurement of the alpha angle was done by a third independent observer and correlated with the subjective results. Correlations between the subjective and measured angles and interobserver variation were calculated. RESULTS: Statistically, significant variability was seen in the subjective assessment of the alpha angle. When the alpha angle was > 55 degrees, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.606, indicating that visual assessment is a poor predictor of a wide alpha angle. Even in patients with a measured normal alpha angle (< 55 degrees), slightly fewer than half were subjectively thought to possibly, likely, or definitely have abnormal angles. Similarly, more than half of the abnormal cases (alpha angles > 55 degrees) were subjectively thought to possibly or probably be normal. CONCLUSION: Subjective assessment of alpha angles is suboptimal unless one is quite confident of a bone abnormality.
机译:目的:髋臼前路撞击是重要的影像学表现。股骨髋臼撞击的凸轮类型的标准之一是股骨头-颈部发育不良,数学上表示为“α角”。一些观察者报告说,由于主观评估可能会产生相似的结果,因此可能不需要直接测量角度。我们试图以计算出的角度作为金标准,科学地确定主观评估的准确性。材料与方法:在1.5 T时,对连续50例患者的髋部进行倾斜轴影像评估。两名骨骼肌肉放射科医生使用1-5的置信度数记录了他们对α角的主观意见。阿尔法角的直接数学测量是由第三位独立的观察者完成的,并且与主观结果相关。计算主观和测量角度与观察者间差异之间的相关性。结果:从统计学上讲,主观评估阿尔法角的过程中存在明显的变异性。当α角> 55度时,接收器工作特性曲线(AUC)下的面积为0.606,这表明视觉评估无法预测宽α角。即使在具有正常法线角(<55度)的患者中,主观认为略小于一半的角度可能,可能或绝对具有异常角度。类似地,超过一半的异常病例(α角> 55度)被主观认为可能是或可能是正常的。结论:除非对骨骼异常有足够的信心,否则主观评估α角是次优的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号