首页> 外文期刊>Health & social care in the community >Perspectives of self‐direction: a systematic review of key areas contributing to service users’ engagement and choice‐making in self‐directed disability services and supports
【24h】

Perspectives of self‐direction: a systematic review of key areas contributing to service users’ engagement and choice‐making in self‐directed disability services and supports

机译:自我方向的透视:对有助于服务用户参与和选择制作的关键领域的系统审查,以自我指导的残疾服务和支持

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Self‐directed disability support policies aim to encourage greater choice and control for service users in terms of the health and social care they receive. The proliferation of self‐directed disability support policies throughout the developed world has resulted in a growing amount of research exploring the outcomes for service users, and their families and carers. Our understanding of the issues faced by people with disabilities, particularly how they make health and social care decisions and the key areas that determine their engagement with service providers within a self‐directed environment is limited. A synthesis of research is timely and can provide knowledge for service users and health and social care support providers to ensure their successful participation. A systematic review guided by the PRISMA approach explored (i) the key areas determining service users’ engagement with self‐directed disability services and supports, and (ii) how service users make informed decisions about providers. In October 2014 and April 2016, three databases – MEDLINE , CINAHL and Web of Science – were searched for research and review articles. Eighteen sources met the search criteria. Findings were mapped into either: key areas determining service user engagement, or service users’ informed decision‐making. Findings concerning key areas determining engagement fell into three themes – personal responsibility for budgeting, personalised approaches, and a cultural shift in practice and delivery among service providers. Findings about decision‐making yielded two themes – supporting informed decision‐making and inhibiting informed decision‐making. Literature suggests that self‐directed models of care may provide service users with increased control over the services that they receive. Increased control for some service users and their families requires independent external decision‐making support, particularly around the domains of budgeting, planning and hiring. Future research must continue to investigate the perspectives of service users pertaining to their engagement, as their participation is central to the effectiveness of the approach.
机译:摘要自我定导的残疾支持政策旨在鼓励在他们收到的健康和社会护理方面对服务用户进行更多选择和控制。在整个发达国家中的自我定导残疾支持政策的扩散导致了越来越多的研究,探索服务用户及其家庭和护理人员的结果。我们对残疾人面临的问题的理解,特别是他们如何使健康和社会关怀决策以及确定他们在自我导向环境中与服务提供商进行参与的关键领域。研究的合成是及时的,可以为服务用户和健康和社会护理支持提供商提供知识,以确保他们的成功参与。由PRISMA方法引导的系统审查探讨(i)确定服务用户与自我指导残疾服务和支持的关键领域,以及(ii)服务用户如何对提供商做出明智的决策。 2014年10月和2016年4月,搜索了三个数据库 - 搜索了研究和审查文章的研究和科学网站。十八个来源符合搜索标准。调查结果被映射到任一:关键领域,确定服务用户参与或服务用户的知识决策。关于确定参与的关键领域的调查结果落入了三个主题 - 个人责任对预算,个性化方法以及服务提供商之间的实践和交付中的文化转变。关于决策的调查结果产生了两个主题 - 支持知情的决策和抑制知情决策。文献表明,自我指导的护理模型可以为服务用户提供更多地控制他们收到的服务。对某些服务用户及其家庭的控制增加需要独立的外部决策支持,特别是在预算,规划和招聘领域。未来的研究必须继续调查与其参与有关的服务用户的角度,因为他们的参与是对方法的有效性的核心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号