首页> 外文期刊>Health & social care in the community >Inequity in cardiovascular care in the English National Health Service (NHS): a scoping review of the literature
【24h】

Inequity in cardiovascular care in the English National Health Service (NHS): a scoping review of the literature

机译:英国国家卫生服务中心血管护理的不公平(NHS):对文献的范围审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract There is a general understanding that socioeconomically disadvantaged people are also disadvantaged with respect to their access to NHS care. Insofar as considerable NHS funding has been targeted at deprived areas, it is important to better understand whether and why socioeconomic variations in access and utilisation exist. Exploring this question with reference to cardiovascular care, our aims were to synthesise and evaluate evidence relating to access to and/or use of English NHS services around (i) different points on the care pathway (i.e. presentation, primary management and specialist management) and (ii) different dimensions of inequality (socioeconomic, age‐ and gender‐related, ethnic or geographical). Restricting our search period from 2004 to 2016, we were concerned to examine whether, compared to earlier research, there has been a change in the focus of research examining inequalities in cardiac care and whether the pro‐rich bias reported in the late 1990s and early 2000s still applies today. We conducted a scoping study drawing on Arksey & O'Malley's framework. A total of 174 studies were included in the review and appraised for methodological quality. Although, in the past decade, there has been a shift in research focus away from gender and age inequalities in access/use and towards socioeconomic status and ethnicity, evidence that deprived people are less likely to access and use cardiovascular care is very contradictory. Patterns of use appear to vary by ethnicity; South Asian populations enjoying higher access, black populations lower. By contrast, female gender and older age are consistently associated with inequity in cardiovascular care. The degree of geographical variation in access/use is also striking. Finally, evidence of inequality increases with stage on the care pathway, which may indicate that barriers to access arise from the way in which health professionals are adjudicating health needs rather than a failure to seek help in the first place.
机译:摘要普遍了解社会经济弱势群体的弱势群体也在获得NHS护理方面处于不利地位。缺乏剥夺地区的目标是相当大的NHS资金,更重要的是更好地了解是否存在访问和利用的社会经济变化。探讨了这个问题,参考心血管护理,我们的目标是综合,并评估有关访问和/或使用英语NHS服务的证据(i)护理途径(即介绍,主要管理和专业管理)和(ii)不等式的不同维度(社会经济,年龄和与性别相关,种族或地域)。从2004年到2016年度限制我们的搜索期,我们致力于审查与早期研究相比,研究审查心脏护理中的不平等的重点以及是否在20世纪90年代后期和早期报告的富裕偏见2000年代仍然适用于今天。我们在Arksey&amp进行了一个范围的学习绘图; O'Malley的框架。审查中共有174项研究并评估了方法质量。虽然在过去的十年中,在进入/使用的性别和年龄不平等和朝着社会经济地位和种族方面存在研究重点,证据表明,被剥夺人员不太可能获得和使用心血管护理的证据是非常矛盾的。使用模式似乎因种族而异;南亚人口享有更高的接入,黑人种群更低。相比之下,女性性别和老年人始终与心血管护理的不公平相关。访问/使用的地理变化程度也在引人注目。最后,在护理途径上的阶段增加了不平等的证据,这可能表明,从卫生专业人员裁定健康需求而不是未能寻求帮助时,可以出现访问的障碍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号