首页> 外文期刊>Health & social care in the community >Discourses of joint commissioning
【24h】

Discourses of joint commissioning

机译:联合调试的话语

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Increasing attention has focused on the role of joint commissioning in health and social care policy and practice in England. This paper provides an empirical examination of the three discourses of joint commissioning developed from an interpretative analysis of documents by D ickinson et?al. (2013; BMC Health Services Research , 13 ) and applied to data from our study exploring the role of knowledge in commissioning in England. Based on interviews with 92 participants undertaken between 2011 and 2013, our analysis confirms that the three discourses of prevention or empowerment or efficiency are used by professionals from across health and social care organisations to frame their experiences of joint commissioning. However, contrary to Dickinson et?al., we also demonstrate that commissioners and other stakeholders combine and trade off these different discourses in unexpected ways. Moreover, at sites where the service user experience was central to the commissioning process (joint commissioning as empowerment), a greater sense of agreement about commissioning decisions appeared to have been established even when the other discourses were also in play.
机译:摘要越来越关注关注联合调试在英格兰健康和社会护理政策和实践中的作用。本文提供了由Dickinson等的解释性分析开发的联合调试的三个散文的实证检查。 (2013; BMC卫生服务研究,13)并应用于我们研究中的数据探索知识在英格兰调试中的作用。根据2011年至2013年至2013年间的92名与会者的访谈,我们的分析证实,专业人士使用卫生和社会护理组织的专业人士使用了三个预防或赋权或效率的措施,以框架联合调试的经验。然而,与Dickinson等相反,我们还展示了专员和其他利益相关者以意想不到的方式结合起来和履行这些不同的话语。此外,在服务用户体验对调试过程中的核心(作为赋权的联合调试)的地点,即使在播放其他话语也在戏剧中,也似乎建立了更大的关于调试决定的协议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号