...
首页> 外文期刊>Health policy and planning >Implication of external price referencing and parallel trade on pharmaceutical expenditure: indirect evidence from lower-income European countries
【24h】

Implication of external price referencing and parallel trade on pharmaceutical expenditure: indirect evidence from lower-income European countries

机译:外部价格参考与平行贸易对药品支出的影响:来自低收入欧洲国家的间接证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

External price referencing (EPR) is applied more and more frequently worldwide by payers to control pharmaceutical prices. Together with the parallel trade of pharmaceuticals, EPR may result in lower pharmaceutical prices in higher-income countries and higher prices in lower-income countries, which implies that pharmaceutical expenditure grows more rapidly in the latter than in the former group. Our objective was to assess this hypothesis. We used hierarchical linear models on country-level panel data to show that—after controlling for compounding factors such as GDP, the proportion of the old-age population or life expectancy—the annual growth rate of pharmaceutical expenditure was 2.1% points larger in the lower- than in the higher-income members of the European Union between 2000 and 2008. This difference in trends became non-significant (0.6% points) after the onset of the global economic crisis. There was no significant difference between lower- and higher-income countries in the growth rate of non-pharmaceutical health expenditure in either period. Our results indirectly support the presence of price convergence of pharmaceuticals among European countries, and EPR and parallel trade may provide a reasonable explanation to the observed trend difference of pharmaceutical expenditure in the two groups of countries between 2000 and 2008. This higher growth rate of pharmaceutical expenditure put extra burden on public health care budgets in lower-income countries and resulted in disproportionately more cost-containment measures compared to higher-income countries after 2008. It remains to be seen whether the disappearance of the difference in trend growth rates due to special health policy interventions in countries with economic difficulties is temporary or permanent.
机译:外部价格参考(EPR)在全球范围内越来越频繁地应用,以控制药品价格。 epr的平行贸易与药物的平行贸易一起导致更高收入国家的药品价格较低,低收入国家的价格较高,这意味着药品支出在后者比前一组更快地增长。我们的目标是评估这一假设。我们在国家级面板数据上使用了分层线性模型,以表明 - 在控制诸如GDP等复合因素的情况下,养老的人口或预期寿命 - 药物支出的年增长率在更大的2.1% 2000年至2008年之间欧盟的高收入成员低于欧盟的高收入成员。在全球经济危机的发作后,趋势的这种差异变得非显着(0.6%)。中低收入国家在两种时期的非药物保健支出的增长率之间没有显着差异。我们的结果间接地支持欧洲国家的药品价格融合的存在,欧洲经常划署和平行贸易可能会对2000年至2008年两组国家的药物支出的观察到趋势差异提供合理的解释。该药物的增长率较高支出对低收入国家的公共医疗预算进行了额外的负担,并导致2008年后更高收入国家更加成本遏制措施。它仍有待观察趋势增长差异的差异消失,因为特殊趋势经济困难国家的健康政策干预是临时的或永久性的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号