...
首页> 外文期刊>Hemodialysis international >Delayed conversion from central venous catheter to non-catheter hemodialysis access associates with an increased risk of death: A retrospective cohort study based on data from a large dialysis provider
【24h】

Delayed conversion from central venous catheter to non-catheter hemodialysis access associates with an increased risk of death: A retrospective cohort study based on data from a large dialysis provider

机译:从中央静脉导管转换到非导管血液透析接入伙伴关系,增加了死亡风险:基于来自大透析提供者的数据的回顾性队列研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Hemodialysis initiation using a central venous catheter (CVC) poses an increased risk of death. Conversion to an arterio-venous graft or fistula (AVF, AVG) improves outcomes. The relationship of primary dialysis access and timing of conversion from CVC to either AVF or AVG to all-cause mortality was investigated. Methods Two retrospective analyses in incident hemodialysis patients commencing treatment from January 2010 to December 2014 in dialysis clinics in the United States were conducted.Analysis 1stratified as per access at initiation and those commencing with CVC were further stratified into (a) those that had a CVC, AVF, or AVG the entire year; (b) those that were converted to either AVF or AVG within either (i) the first or (ii) the second 6 months. Kaplan Meier analysis and Cox regression analysis were employed.Analysis 2included all CVC patients investigating the relationship between access conversion time and mortality risk using a Cox proportional hazards model depicting the hazard ratio (HR) as a spline function over time. Results Two subsets from initial 78,871 patients were studied. InAnalysis 1both AVF (referent) and AVG [HR 1.12 (0.97 to 1.30)] associated with a better outcome than CVC [HR 1.55 (1.38 to 1.74)] during follow-up. Lower mortality risk was seen for early switch from a CVC to AV access within the first 6 months [HR = 1.04 (0.97-1.13)] compared to a later switch [HR = 1.23 (1.10-1.38)].Analysis 2indicated that a CVC to AVF switch resulted in improved survival.Analysis2 indicated early conversion to confer a survival benefit for CVC to AVG switch. Discussion and Conclusion AVF and AVG show a survival benefit over CVC. Early conversion from CVC to either access improves survival. This emphasizes the importance of early preparation for dialysis by creation of an AVF or AVG and to convert CVCs early.
机译:背景技术使用中央静脉导管(CVC)的血液透析引发造成了增加的死亡风险。转化为动脉静脉移植物或瘘管(AVF,AVG)改善了结果。研究了初级透析和从CVC转化为AVF或AVG的关系的关系进行了研究。方法采用2010年1月至2014年12月在美国的透析诊所开始治疗的两种回顾性分析。根据启动的开始,每次接入,与CVC开始的人进一步分层,AVF,或AVG全年; (b)那些在第二个月内或(ii)内(i)的AVF或AVG转换成那些第二个月。雇用了Kaplan Meier分析和Cox回归分析。Analysis 2被调查了使用描述危险比(HR)随时间的花键函数的Cox比例危险模型来研究访问转换时间和死亡率风险之间的关系。结果初始78,871名患者的两亚类进行了研究。在随访期间,与比CVC [HR 1.55(1.38至1.74)]相关的1both AVF(参考文献)和AVG [HR 1.12(0.97至1.30)]。与稍后的开关相比,从CVC从CVC到AV接入的早期开关看到降低死亡率风险[HR = 1.04(0.97-1.13)]。分析2INDICTY CVC对于AVF开关导致了改善的存活.Analysis2表明早期转化赋予CVC到AVG开关的存活益处。讨论和结论AVF和AVG显示出对CVC的生存效益。从CVC提前转换为任何一种访问都会改善生存。这强调了通过创建AVF或AVG并早期转化CVCs来重视透析的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号